羽球單打比賽戰術類型研究之效度與信度

本研究目的在利用多層面Rasch模式分析羽球單打比賽戰術類型研究之效度與信度。研究方法根據Safrit(1989)的領域參照效度以專家問卷調查，建立羽球單打比賽戰術觀察表的邏輯效度，利用Facets軟體估計效度與信度。研究結果爲：一、建立單打比賽七種戰術類型之觀察紀錄表。評分者同質性考驗顯示教練對戰術的選項一致、一致性72.0%，戰術類型Rasch個別信度爲.77。二、驗證戰術類型觀察紀錄表具有效度與信度。評分者同質性考驗顯示評判一致、一致性98.2%，評分者常態性考驗顯示評分者具有代表性、證明有效度；戰術類型適合度考驗證明具有效度，Rasch個別信度.63，同質性考驗顯示戰術類型具有鑑別度，常態性考驗證明戰術類型有代表性、即有效度。結論爲：運用發球搶攻、接發球搶攻、拉吊突擊、變速突擊、下壓搶網、守中反攻、控制網前等七項戰術類型可以用來分析羽球單打比賽，可做爲教練、選手訓練及比賽或研究者將來研究之參考。

關鍵字

羽球；單打；戰術；比賽分析；問卷調查

並列摘要

The purpose of study was to use the many facet Rasch model to analyze the validity and reliability of tactical pattern on the singles game in badminton. Based on the method of Safrit's (1989) domain-referenced validity was to survey expert by questionnaire, which was to establish the logical validity of observation table of tactical pattern in badminton singles game. The validity and reliability of estimation was done by using the Facets program. The results of study indicated that: 1. The seven tactical pattern of observation table had been established on the singles game in badminton. The fixed test of raters showed that judges were all the same and rater agreement was 72.0%. The Rasch separation reliability of tactical pattern was .77.2. The tactical pattern of observation table had been confirmed that had validity and reliability. The raters of fixed test were showed that judges were all the same and rater agreement was 98.2%. The normal test of raters showed that rater was representative and validity was proved. The data-model fit proved tactical pattern was validity and Rasch separation reliability of tactical pattern was. 63. The fixed test of tactical pattern showed that difficulty was discriminative. The normal test showed tactical pattern was representative and validity. The conclusion suggested that by observing the following seven tactics, including service with attack, attack after receive, hit to whole court with attack by varied basic skills, attack by changeable speed, downward hit to gain control over net, attack after defending, gain control over the front net, we could analyze the features of single badminton players. With his frequently-used and forte/weak tactics, we could help a single player win the game by reorganizing strategy.

並列關鍵字

badminton ； single ； tactics ； game analysis ； questionnaire survey

參考文獻

Badminton South Africa – Director: Coaching (2003). Coaching Manuallevel 1, Retrieved March 25, 2009, from http//http://www.badmintonsa.org/documents/coaches/Coaching%20_Manual_Level_1.doc

Google Scholar

Downey, J. (2007). Tactics in Badminton Singles. www.badminton.tv/sites/badminton/media/books/tactics-in-badminton-singles/part-1.pdf

Google Scholar

Peter Yong S. O. (1993). Coaching and playing Badminton the right way. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia: Baron production Sdn Bhd.

Google Scholar

Safrit, M. J. (1989). Criterion-Referenced Measurement: Validity. In M. J. Safrit & T. M. Wood (Ed.), Measurement Concepts in Physical Education and Exercise Science (119-135). Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers.