透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.107.96
  • 期刊

變遷的公共財理論與都市治理結構從新古典到新制度經濟學之引介

The Changing Conception of Public Goods and Urban Governance from Neo-classical to New Institutional Economics

摘要


經濟學上的公共財理論一直以來都是傳統都市規劃與治理的核心議題。然而,1950年代所提出的公共財理論與立基在於該理論的傳統都市規劃與治理的實踐並不成功。因此,西方經濟與規劃學者也分別對此做了更進一步的討論與反省。尤其應用新制度經濟學的觀念重新闡釋公共財與都市治理的關係,產生不少洞見,也值得臺灣規劃或地理界參考。從近來西方規劃學者的討論中發現,純粹的公共財在現實世界中其實很少,大多皆是俱樂部財貨性質的共享性資源,且這些具共享性的俱樂部財,具有多種屬性,會因社會與經濟的情勢與所屬的時空而有不同的制度安排。因此,在理論與實際案例上,都可發現公共財的提供與都市治理非只有政府而已,共享性資源的提供,存有很多都市治理結構的可能。而交易成本理論更可以提供都市治理結構的制度選擇範圍與其制度特性。這些新的討論與新制度經濟學的觀點,都對臺灣都市治理與規劃體制具有極高的啟發與參考價值。

並列摘要


The theory of public goods under economic conditions has always been a core issue in traditional urban planning and governance. However, the practice of traditional urban planning and governance based on the public goods theory over the last century has not been successful, which has subsequently led to further discussions from scholars in economics and urban planning. Many western scholars apply New Institutional Economics to re-assess the concept of public goods and institutional choice, which has resulted in insightful discoveries. They may be of help to Taiwan's planning and geography researchers, practitioners and policy-makers. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to introduce recent discussions of and concepts about the public goods theory from western economists and planning scholars, from neo-classics economics to new institutional economics. Recent discussions show that pure public goods are, actually, rare. The most common shared resources are club goods; these club goods have manifold characteristics, and are accessible in accordance with each club member’s societal and economic status. Therefore, from both theoretical and practical viewpoints, government does not have to be the sole supplier of public goods and urban governance. The supply of common pool resources shows that there are many possibilities for the urban governance structure. Moreover, the transaction cost theory demonstrates the institutional spectrum of urban governance and their differences. All of these insights, based on New Institutional Economics are valuable to Taiwan's urban planning and urban governance.

參考文獻


Knight, F. H. (1924) Some fallacies in the interpretation of social costs, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 38(4): 582-606.
Alexander, E. R.(1986).Approaches To Planning.Luxembourg:Gordon and Breach.
Alexander, E. R.(2001).A transaction-cost theory of land use planning and development control: towards the institutional analysis of public planning.Town Planning Review.72(1),1-31.

被引用紀錄


胡少瑾(2017)。情境式的公共性:台北市大同區整宅形隨時序而生的神聖空間形態變遷〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201700802
鄔廸嘉(2015)。以委託代理人模型探討空間文化資產:以金門為例〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.00781
李玉婷(2014)。汙水治理機制之研究-以汙水下水道收費政策為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.10784
鍾一鼎(2015)。國有林地治理與原住民保留地之衝突分析:以桃園市復興區為例〔碩士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.M0011109
呂岳玓(2012)。桃園眷村文化節的公私協力模式研究〔碩士論文,元智大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0009-2801201415022108

延伸閱讀