透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.227.228.95
  • 期刊

幽默創造訓練之課程設計暨實徵效果評估

A Course Design for Creative Training of Humor and the Effects of an Empirically Evaluative Study

摘要


本研究目的在分析幽默創造技巧、設計幽默訓練課程,及進行課程之效果評估。在預備性研究部份,以陳學志、王强之、丘發忠、蕭韶華(民88)的分類爲基礎,重新對網路上之3218則幽默刺激做分析。結果發現7類最常用之幽默創造規則,其分別為:「掌握諧音」、「語句的組合技巧」、「詞彙意義的多重性」、「語句意義的多重推論性」、「錯誤的推論」、「重新解釋」、「隱喻推論」技巧。在正式研究裡,以上述7類技巧及相關學習理論為基礎,設計幽默創造訓練課程:並以實驗組、控制組,前後測的研究設計,邀請政戰學校30位學生爲參與者,檢驗此課程的有效性。研究結果為:1)經過訓練後,參與者在「幽默創造測驗」中使用幽默創造技巧的次數上,有大幅顯著的增加。2)經過技巧訓練後,雖然在限制參與者使用特定單項技巧的「幽默創造測驗」上,所顯現的幽默程度僅「語句的組合」技巧達到顯著提升的效果;然而在不限定使用何種技巧的「整體延宕幽默創造測驗」中,實驗組之表現在幽默程度上有顯著的提昇。3)就7種技巧的效果比較而言,「掌握諧音」、「語句的組台」、「詞彙意義的多重性」、「語句意義的多重推論性」4項技巧的訓練效果是較佳的,其它的技巧則有改進的空間。

並列摘要


This study was to design a humor-creating course and to explore its effectiveness. In the pilot study, 3218 jokes collected from Internet were reanalyzed by a framework proposed by Chen etc. (1999). Seven most often used humor-creating skills were found: homonym, word-combination, lexical ambiguity, syntactic ambiguity, erroneous inference, reinterpretation, and metaphorical inference. In the formal study, a humor-creating course was set up and 15 students from the Fu Hsing Kang College participated the experimental and control group respectively. Before and after the training course, all participants received a humor-creating test. The results suggested. (a) the frequency of using humor-creating skills vas increased significantly in the tests; (b) when the skill is designated, the training effect as found only in word-combination skill condition However, with no restriction, the experimental subjects scored higher on humor- creating test than the controls. (c) skills of homonym, word-combination, lexical ambiguity and syntactic ambiguity resealed better training effects as compared to others.

參考文獻


Amabile, T. M.,S. G. Isaksen(Ed.)(1987).Frontiers of creativity research: Beond the basics.Buffalo. NY:Bearly.
Anderson, J. R.(1982).Acquisition of cognitive skill.Psychological Review.89(4),369-406.
Bizi, S.,Keinan, G.,Beit-Hallahmi, B.(1989).Humor and coping with stress: A test under real-life conditions.Personality and Individual Differences.9(6),951-956.
Borkowski, J. G.,Kurtz, B. E.(1987).Metacognition and executive control.(Cognition in special children).
Boverie, P.,Hoffman, J,Klein, D. C.(1994).Humor in human resource development.Human Resource Development Quarterly.5(1),75-91.

被引用紀錄


詹雅婷(2012)。主管幽默風格與幽默領導行為對員工工作滿意影響之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2012.00087
黃婉惠(2008)。幽默領導因果模式之實證研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2008.00975
沈靖宜(2006)。幽默領導之初探〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2006.00791
江珮鈺(2014)。國中教師幽默感、身心健康與創新教學關係之研究-以桃園縣為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201400230
范怡芳(2002)。影響被嘲弄者認知評估及情緒之因素〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200200615

延伸閱讀