透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.226.150.175
  • 期刊

電腦化適性職涯性向測驗編製研究

Construction of the Computerized Adaptive Career Aptitude Test for Junior High School Students

摘要


一個好的職涯測驗可讓學生瞭解自身之心理狀態,亦可作為生涯規劃與抉擇的工具,而國內現有之性向測驗大多為紙筆測驗,其題數較多且題目內容與真實職業情境差異較大,使其在施測及應用與解釋時有較大的限制。有鑑於此,本研究整合測驗、心理計量之適性化技術與多媒體技術,開創測驗內容、向度與題型,編製「電腦化適性職涯性向測驗-國中版」﹙CACAT-J﹚,共包括八個分測驗,分別為語文、數學、空間、邏輯推理、科學推理、觀察、美感和創意。此測驗可同時測量學生多面向之潛能,以作為學生與教師在進行生涯輔導與科系媒合時之有效工具。本研究預試樣本人數為3163人,正式樣本為5820人。在IRT之樣本層次信度介於.69~.81;在效度方面,與國中基本學力測驗之相關係數介於.28~.67。綜合上述,本測驗具有良好之信度及效度。在常模建置方面,因屬電腦化測驗,可定期更新常模資料。透過測驗參照團體定期更新,以確保測驗分數的可比較性。CACAT-J所提供之測驗結果,學生能瞭解其自身之優勢能力,將有助於學生探索與掌握自我,進而培養生涯決策與規劃能力。

並列摘要


A qualified career test could play an important role in providing information for students' self-understanding and career decision-making. However, there are limitations and problems within the existing career aptitude tests in Taiwan. This study integrates psychological testing, adaptive techniques of psychometrics, and multimedia technology to establish a computerized adaptive career aptitude test (CACAT-J). The CACAT-J consists of brand new subject matters, dimensions and test items. Not only is the test more relevant with increased prediction power, but it also provides beneficial career counseling for students and teachers. The CACAT-J consisted of eight sub-tests: Verbal, Numerical, Spatial, Logical Reasoning, Scientific Reasoning, Observation, Aesthetics, and Creativity. There were 5820 participants in the present study. Reliability for the findings in this study ranged from .69 to .81. In terms of validity, the aptitude test scores were significantly correlated with junior high school students' basic competence tests and ranged from .28 to .67. Through this test, students were able to understand their aptitudes on different skills that would enhance their career exploration and their capacity for effective career decision-making and planning.

參考文獻


Chan, Y. C., Chen, H. C., Cho, S. L., & Martin, R. A. (2011). Development of a traditional Chinese version of the humor styles questionnaire. Psychological Testing, Special Issue: Positive Traits Assessment, 207-234.
宋曜廷、田秀蘭、鄭育文(2012):國中與高中職階段生涯測驗使用現況之分析研究。教育心理學報,43(4),875-898。[Sung, Y. T., Tian, H. L., & Cheng, Y. W. (2012). Analysis of career development tests in secondary, high, and vocational high school. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 43(4), 875-898.]
陳學志、洪素蘋、許禕芳、邱皓政、關秉寅、詹志禹(2009):擴散性思考與聚斂性思考的交會: 有限解答之擴散性思考測驗之編製與信效度檢驗。教育科學研究期刊,54﹙4﹚,29-61。[Chen, H. C., Hung, S. P., Hsu, Y. F., Chiou, H. C., Kuan, P. Y., & Chan, C. Y. (2009). The connection of divergent thinking and convergent thinking: Developing of constrained divergent thinking test and examining reliability and validity. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 54(4), 29-61.]
Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15(4), 365-381.
Boyle, G. J., & Joss-Reid, J. M. (2004). Relationship of humour to health: A psychometric investigation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 9(1), 51-66.

被引用紀錄


Chi-Ping Deng(2022)。Emic Interest-Based Classification and Interest Model of College Majors in Taiwan教育心理學報54(2),461-482。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202212_54(2).0009
趙子揚、宋曜廷(2019)。中學生考試壓力與個人特性:潛在類別分析教育科學研究期刊64(3),203-235。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0008
趙子揚、黃嘉莉、宋曜廷、郭蕙寧、許明輝(2016)。教師情境判斷測驗之編製教育科學研究期刊61(2),85-117。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).04

延伸閱讀