透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.22.244
  • 期刊

學前家庭讀寫活動與學習資源對四年級兒童閱讀表現的影響

The Influence of Early Home Literacy Activities and Home Resources for Learning on Fourth Grade Students' Reading Performance

摘要


父母對兒童閱讀表現的影響可從學前親子家庭閱讀活動及提供的家庭學習資源看出,然而過去研究未比較兩者中哪一項對兒童的閱讀表現影響較大。本研究的目的在藉由PIRLS 2006、2011、2016三年度的評量,檢驗學前家庭讀寫活動及家庭學習資源對四年級兒童閱讀成就表現的影響,藉以探究兩者對兒童閱讀表現的重要性。臺灣PIRLS 2006共有4589位、PIRLS 2011共有4293位及PIRLS 2016共有4326位的國小四年級學生及學生家長參與。評量工具包括「PIRLS閱讀理解測驗」評量學生的閱讀成績,家長填寫「PIRLS閱讀學習調查」以瞭解家長教育程度、學前家庭讀寫活動及家中學習資源的情況。經由比較三年度的資料可以發現,父母教育程度對兒童閱讀表現的預測力最大。整體來看,學前家中愈常進行家庭讀寫活動,四年級兒童的閱讀理解能力愈好。家中學習資源愈多,四年級兒童的閱讀理解能力愈好。然而學前家庭讀寫活動與家庭學習資源不一定有或多,就對兒童的閱讀能力有益,例如,寫字詞和兒童擁有自己的手機並非對兒童閱讀能力有益。父母與子女間常一起看書比提供資源對子女閱讀表現的影響多一些。結果顯示學前家庭讀寫活動對四年級兒童閱讀表現的影響較大。

並列摘要


Parents play a critical role in the literacy development of their children (Baker, 2003; Kush et al., 2005; Lee & Barro, 1998; Sonnenschein et al., 1996; Weinberger, 1996). Providing early home literacy activities or home resources for learning will improve children's development of literacy skills. Parental involvement is frequently mentioned as a parental factor related to children's reading (e.g., Arnold et al., 2008; Baker et al., 1995; Begum, 2007; Considine & Zappala, 2002; Lee & Barro, 1998; Rowe, 1991). Parental involvement refers to the amount of contact parents have with their children, the quality of their interactions, and their participation in their children's school and home activities (Izzo et al., 1999). Home literacy activities include taking one's children to the library, playing games to teach children new things, reading to children, engaging in shared reading, and providing reading materials. Research has revealed that reading enrichment activities at home have significantly positive influences on students' reading achievement (Begum, 2007; Lynch et al., 2006; Purcell-Gates, 1995; Roberts et al., 2005; Rowe, 1991). Greater parental involvement has been associated with stronger preliteracy skills, and literacy experiences during the child's preschool years have been associated with subsequent reading achievement (Arnold, et al., 2008; Neuman & Dickinson, 2001). Moreover, the availability of reading materials in the home is likewise strongly related to achievement in mathematics and science as well as reading (Sénéchal et al., 1998). Students with numerous books at home exhibit higher achievement in mathematics and science. However, whether early home literacy activities or home resources for learning are more influential on children's reading performance remains understudied. In 2001, Taiwan began conducting national reading programs, which implemented reading activities in schools and even benefited students in rural areas. The government and private organizations have also begun to promote reading activities (e.g., Bookstart which is to give free books to every child under the age of 5) in families because of their own children's reading development. After more than 10 years, the effects of literacy activity promotion and the provision of learning resources for preschool children in Taiwanese families were examined. The goals of this study were to compare the influence of early home literacy activity with home resources for learning on children's reading ability and to identify which factor was more crucial for their reading ability. Data from the Progress in International Reading and Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2006, PIRLS 2011, and PIRLS 2016 in Taiwan were used. The studies had 4589 participants in 2006, 4293 in 2011, and 4326 in 2016, and all participants were fourth-grade students and their parents in Taiwan. Children's reading achievement, early home literacy activity, and home resources for learning were measured using the Reading Achievement Assessment, Student Questionnaire, and Learning to Read Survey from PIRLS 2006, 2011, and 2016. The PIRLS assesses four comprehension processes in reading. The passages in the PIRLS are accompanied by colorful illustrations to help engage students' interest, and several informational articles have noncontinuous text features such as text boxes or diagrams. The PIRLS includes 10 passages ranging in length from approximately 800 to 1000 English words (approximately 500 to 900 Chinese characters). The PIRLS achievement booklets are designed to assess children's ability to comprehend text through comprehension questions. Each child responded to the assessment and received reading achievement scores. The PIRLS Learning to Read Survey was adopted for this study. Students' parents were asked to report on the availability of home resources related to reading achievement. The survey investigated child-parent literacy interactions, home literacy resources, parents' reading habits and attitudes, and home-school connections. The items of early literacy experiences at home included reading books, telling stories, singing songs, playing with alphabet toys, talking about things the child has done, talking about things he or she has read, playing word games, writing letters or words, and reading signs and labels aloud. Students were scored according to their parents' frequency of engaging in these activities with them. All items were rated on a three-point Likert-type scale in which answers ranged from 1 (never or almost never) to 3 (often). The Student Questionnaire was administered to determine students' home resources for learning. Students were asked to report on the availability of home resources. Home resources for learning included the following: parental education level, number of books at home, number of children's books at home, a computer, a study desk for the student's use, an Internet connection, a room of their own, and access to new digital media. All items were answered with yes or no. The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement's (IEA's) International Database Analyzer (IDB Analyzer) was used to combine and analyze data from all IEA large-scale assessments. This software tool analyzes data from most major large-scale assessments, including those conducted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, and the PIRLS (IEA, 2016). Each student was provided a single test booklet containing only a portion of the PIRLS assessment. The results were aggregated across all booklets to provide results for the entire assessment, and plausible values were generated as estimates of student performance on the entire assessment. Students' performance averages were computed as the average of the weighted means for each of the five plausible values. The variability among these estimates, or the imputation error, for each variable was combined with the sampling error for that variable, providing an appropriate standard error that incorporates both error components. IDB Analyzer can handle complex sample designs and uses a plausible value methodology to calculate correct standard errors in analyses with large-scale surveys. Descriptive statistics, including percentages and means, statistical significance tests, and linear regression with dummy coding, were used to analyze the data. The results revealed that among educational level, early home literacy activity, and home resources for learning, parents' educational level was the strongest predictor of fourth-grade children's reading achievement. After comparing the results of the PIRLS 2006, 2011 and 2016, we found a strong positive relationship between reading achievement and early home literacy activity. Moreover, students' reading achievement was positively related to their home resources for learning. However, the results further indicated that not all early home literacy activities and home resources for learning were beneficial to students' reading. Furthermore, more activities or resources for learning did not translate to enhanced student reading achievement. For example, parents spending time teaching their children to write letters or words and children having their own cell phone were not beneficial to their reading performance. Parents reading books with their children prior to them entering school was more predictive of children's reading achievement later in primary school compared with any home resource for learning. In sum, the results seemed to indicate that early home literacy activity is more influential than home resources are for learning on children's reading performance. Both the frequency of early literacy activities and amount of home resources for learning increased over the 12-year period. This indicated that families in Taiwan have become increasingly willing to provide resources for their children to learn, and parents of preschool children are willing to spend more time reading together. The results also indicated that reading activities in families promoted by the government and private organizations have had a positive impact on the reading and writing activities and provision of learning resources for preschool children in Taiwanese families.

參考文獻


陳明蕾(2019):〈台灣十年來教師閱讀教學與學生閱讀表現關係之探討:來自 PIRLS 2006、2011 與 2016 的證據〉。《教育心理學報》,51(1),51-82。[Chen, M.-L. (2019). The relationship between teacher reading instruction and students’ reading performance in the past ten years of Taiwan: Evidence from PIRLS 2006, 2011 and 2016. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 51(1), 51–82.] https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201909_51(1).0003
林佳惠、劉惠美、張鑑如(2019):〈家庭脈絡下的親子共讀與幼兒發展關係-臺灣幼兒發展調查資料庫的應用與分析〉。《教育心理學報》,51(1),135-159。[Lin, C.-H., Liu, H.-M., & Chang, C.-J. (2019). Effects of shared book reading practices on child development in the context of Taiwanese families: Applying data from kids in Taiwan study. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 51(1), 135–159.] https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201909_51(1).0006
Alivernini, F., Lucidi, F., Manganelli, S., & Di Leo, I. (2011). A map of factors influencing reading literacy across European countries: Direct, indirect and moderating effects. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 15, 3205–3210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.272
Aram, D., Korat, O., Hassunah-Arafat, S. (2013). The contribution of early home literacy activities to first grade reading and writing achievement in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 1517-1536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9430-y
Baker, L. (2003). The role of parents in motivating struggling readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308207

被引用紀錄


崔新玲、鍾志從、梁進龍、吳和堂(2023)。家庭環境影響幼兒語言發展因果關係之研究教育心理學報55(1),1-24。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202309_55(1).0001

延伸閱讀