MARC 21機讀編目格式轉換為BIBFRAME 2.0書目框架格式之研究：以紅樓夢印刷文字資料為例

本研究以國立臺灣師範大學圖書館502筆紅樓夢印刷文字資料之書目為例，依據BIBFRAME 2.0之書目實體框架與紅樓夢MARC 21書目欄位的映射，探索BIBFRAME 2.0的實體整併。研究結果發現，BIBFRAME是以超作品概念來整併實體，並透過由作者名稱與作品題名以雜湊函數生成URI，於不同MARC 21欄位附加該特定URI來鏈結不同關係的書目，讓書目能以Hub的形式整合。美國國會圖書館的LC BIBFRAME資料庫能透過整併而自動連結的書目關係，包含原著關係、譯本關係、主題關係，以及相關關係，就本研究所探討之紅樓夢書目，四種關係皆可以呈現。整併過程之關鍵為一組具有固定格式的作者名稱與作品題名，故在編目方面，相關欄位的著錄方式與使用詞彙變得更需要具備一致性。

關鍵字

BIBFRAME 2.0 ；書目框架格式； MARC 21 ；機讀編目格式

並列摘要

The purpose of this study is to explore the process of converting bibliographic records from MARC 21 to BIBFRAME 2.0, using the work of Hong Lou Meng as an example to analyze the process of converting MARC 21 bibliographic records to the BIBFRAME framework, including how to merge entities and how to adjust the MARC fields for converting MARC 21 records to BIBFRAME triples. The conclusion of this study is that BIBFRAME implements entity consolidation based on the concept of super work, and generates URIs in a hash function through a set of fixed vocabularies generated by author names and work titles, and attaches them to different MARC 21 fields. The bibliographic records with different relationships are linked by specific URI, so that the bibliographic records can be integrated by Hub. The bibliographic relationships that can actually be integrated and automatically linked by LC BIBFRAME database includes original relationship, translation relationship, subject relationship, and related relationships. For the Hong Lou Meng bibliographic records discussed in this study, four relationships can be presented. The key to the consolidation process is a set of author names and titles of works with a fixed format. Therefore, in terms of cataloging, the description methods and vocabulary of related fields need to be more consistent.

並列關鍵字

BIBFRAME 2.0 ； Bibliographic Framework Format ； MARC 21 ； Machine-readable cataloging format

參考文獻

朱美華（2018）。關聯數據時代的BIBFRAME 2.0。數字圖書館論壇，3，47-52。https://doi.org/10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2018.03.009【Zhu, Meihua (2018). BIBFRAME 2.0 in the linked data era. Digital Library Forum, 3, 47-52. https://doi.org/10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2018.03.009 (in Chinese)】

Chen, P. P.-S. (1976), The entity-relationship model: Toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 9-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/320434.320440

Jin, Q., Hahn, J., & Croll, G. (2016). BIBFRAME transformation for enhanced discovery. Library Resources & Technical Services, 60(4), 223-235. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.60n4.223

Lee, J. H., Jett, J., Cho, H., Windleharth, T., Disher, T., Kiryakos, S., & Sugimoto, S. (2018). Reconceptualizing superwork for improved access to popular cultural objects. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 274-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501030

Sha, V. T. (1995). Cataloging internet resources: The library approach. The Electronic Library, 13(5), 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb045414

國際替代計量

MARC 21機讀編目格式轉換為BIBFRAME 2.0書目框架格式之研究：以紅樓夢印刷文字資料為例

全文下載

主題瀏覽