透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.15.202.4
  • 期刊

陸資企業在臺灣投資的表現與特性分析

The Analysis of Performance and Characteristics of Chinese Investors in Taiwan

摘要


本研究運用2014∼2019年間累積訪問的746家陸資在臺投資業者(約為核准陸資投資企業數的53.7%)的混合資料(pooled data),包括廠商資料、問卷回覆、及訪談資訊,分析受限制的陸資企業在臺獲利表現,並探討影響陸資企業在臺投資獲利的主要因素。迴歸結果顯示,具國企背景及具外資背景的陸資企業表現較佳,尤其主要市場在中國大陸的服務業國企,以及客戶主要在臺灣的製造業國企。此外,以陸資既有技術配合臺灣人才的營業模式,對陸資企業的在臺營運表現有正向影響,此種模式在服務業尤其顯著。最後,就經營環境而言,臺灣北部產業聚落有助提升在臺製造業陸資企業的營運表現,另具體表達面臨營運障礙的服務業陸資稅後損益顯著較差。配合訪談歸納,具中國大陸國企背景的在臺陸資為維持在臺據點,即便無法推展母集團主要業務,亦能在母集團的資源挹注下,尋找合適的商業機會與營運模式,善用臺灣的優勢,故有較佳的營運表現。

並列摘要


By using the firm-level pooled data collected from 2014 to 2019, which included basic information of the companies, their questionnaire responses, and interview records of 746 companies invested by/with Chinese entrepreneurs in Taiwan (about 53.7% of the approved Chinese invested companies), this study aimed to analyze the performance of those Chinese companies whose operation was restricted in Taiwan, and discuss the main determinants for those Chinese enterpreneurs' profitability. The regression results showed that the Chinese companies with background of SOE and foreign enterprises performed better, especially SOEs in service sector whose main market is in mainland China, and SOEs in manufacturing sector whose customers are mainly in Taiwan. In addition, the business model of using the existing technologies of Chinese companies to cooperate with Taiwanese talents has a positive impact on the performance of those Chinese companies in Taiwan, especially in the service industry. Finally, regarding the environment, the industrial cluster in northern Taiwan showed positive impact on the performance of Chinese companies in Taiwan, especially for those in manufacturing sectors. And those who concretely expressed that facing operational obstacles earned less after-tax profit, especially for those in service sector. In conjunction with the interview records, in order to "maintain a foothold in Taiwan", Chinese investors with SOE background would try to find suitable operation models and dig out business opportunities in Taiwan with the resources from their parent group, even if they were usually banned from running the main business of their parent group. Therefore, they still present better performances compare to other Chinese invested companies in Taiwan.

參考文獻


工商時報,2017,〈社論:中共加強收編國企,臺商宜審慎因應〉,https://www.chinatimes.com/opinion/20170823000022-262113?chdtv,查閱時間:2021/06/21。Commercial Times. 2017. “Shelun: zhonggong jiaqiang shoubian guoqi, taishang yi shenshen yinying” [Editorial: The CCP Strengthens the Integration of State-Owned Enterprises, Taiwan Businessmen Should Be Cautious]. (Accessed on June 21, 2021).
中央通訊社,2020,〈經濟部3大限縮令嚴審陸資來臺投資,行政院:支持〉,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202012300227.aspx,查閱時間:2021/06/21。The Central News Agency. 2020. “Jingjibu 3 da xiansuoling yanshen luzi laitai touzi, hangzhengyuan: zhichi” [The Ministry of Economic Affairs Strictly Scrutinizes Chinese Investment in Taiwan, and the Executive Yuan: support]. (Accessed on June 21, 2021).
史惠慈等人,2006,〈中國大陸之國際併購策略及國際影響〉,全球產業科技競合與價值創造之創新政策計畫,計畫編號:95-EC-17-B-31-R2-0613,臺北:經濟部技術處。Shih, Hui-tzu et al. 2006. Zhongguo dalu zhi guoji binggou celue ji guoji yingxiang[International M&A Strategy and International Influence in Mainland China]. Innovation Policy Plan for Global Industrial Technology Competition and Value Creation Project number: 95-EC-17-B-31-R2-0613. Taipei: Technical Office of the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
投審會,2021,〈110年1月份核准僑外投資、陸資來臺投資、國外投資、對中國大陸投資統計月報〉,https://www.moeaic.gov.tw/news.view?do=data&id=1502&lang=ch&type=business_ann,查閱時間:2021/06/21。Investment Review Committee. 2021. “110 nian 1 yuefen hezhun qiaowai touzi, luzi laitai touzi, guowai touzi, dui zhongguo dalu touzi tongji yuebao” [January 2011 Approved Overseas Chinese Investment, Mainland Investment in Taiwan, Foreign Investment, and Statistical Monthly Report on Investment in Mainland China]. (Accessed on June 21, 2021).
Arnold, Jens M., and Katrin Hussinger. 2005. “Export Behavior and Firm Productivity in German Manufacturing: A Firm-Level Analysis.” Review of World Economics, 141: 219-243.

延伸閱讀