The paper is purported to examine discourses of mainstream planning theories and structuralist planning theories and points out their common weaknesses in downplaying the two perspectives of historical development and space. With an aim to redeem this downplaying, the article subsequently makes an effort to construct a development historicalist (regulationist) planning theory by integrating the arguments of regulation theory and spatial theory developed recently. It is suggested that formulation of a healthy development mode in capitalist development history is overwhelmingly dependent on the coherent articulation and performance of spatial form with other institutional forms including accumulation regime, social regulation, hegemonic blocs, while the coherent articulation and performance are a strategic result of spatial regulation regime manipulated by the state.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。