透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.60.166
  • 期刊

從生產、 生活及生態觀點檢視台灣地區縣市永續發展差異性之研究

Examining the Potential of Sustainable Development for Taiwan Cities from Economic, Living, And Ecological Perspectives

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


檢視一地區發展的基礎以具有減損益此基礎的外力大小,為探討永續發展的重要課題。本文用「國土綜合開發計畫」所揭櫫的三項目標:建設生產環境、改善生活品質、及維護生態環境,做為檢視面向,並且延續先前研究建議之都市永續發展指標項目,從中採用合適本研究界定的檢視面向、時間尺度、以及地理空間基本單元,再配合「壓力─狀態─反應」指標架構,展現指標與永續發展觀念間之關聯性,俾益提供檢視一都市有關永續發展的基礎以及具有減損或增益此基礎的外力。接著,本研究將歸屬於生產、生活、及生態三生面向的單項指標群,以線性方式,組合成複合指數,檢視台灣地區23縣市在民國70、75、80、及85年四個時間點上,有關三生面向複合數值的變動情形。此外,本研究以民國85年23縣市三生面向的複合指數值為依據,進行群落分析,展現23縣市在永續發展基礎上的相對差異性,並以分類結果為架構,研提加強三生基礎之策略。

並列摘要


To examine the base of development for an economy and to measure the force which can undermine or strengthen the base are important on the subject of sustainable development. This paper examines the 23 cities of Taiwan from the perspective of economic, living, and ecological status, which arc the objectives proposed in the document of National Comprehensive Landuse Development Plan. The status of these three aspects was measured by 19 indicators from previous studies for sustainable cities in accordance with the ”pressure-state-response” indicator framework, at the time of 1981,1986, 1991, and 1996. These indicators were then aggregated into three composite indexes, which were then used to indicate the change in the status of the three aspects during the 15 years and compare the differences among the 23 cities. In addition, this research used cluster analysis to classify the potential of sustainable development for the 23 cities according to their economic, living, and ecological status in 1996. The result was then used as a framework to propose strategies for implementing sustainability for these cities.

參考文獻


Azar, C., Holmberg, J., Lindgren, K.(1996).Socio-ecological Indicators for Sustainability.Ecological Economics.18
Brink, B. ten(1991).In Search of Sustainable Development.Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Brundtland''s World Commission on Environment and Development(1987).Our Common Future.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Daly, H. E.(1990).Toward Some Operational Principles of Sustainable Development.Ecological Economics.2
Graaf, H. J. de, Muster, C. J. M., ter Keurs, W. J.(1996).Sustainable Development: Looking for New Strategies.Ecological Economics.16

被引用紀錄


周鶴樹(2010)。從景觀生態格局與變遷探索台灣國家公園的永續規劃—以玉山國家公園為例〔博士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201000525
簡嘉儀(2009)。社區永續環境指標之建構〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0015-2508200912073400
歐宗園(2012)。聯合國永續發展指標權重之探討-層級分析法之應用〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-0305201210333567

延伸閱讀