衝擊後編定工業區的規劃治理反思－以安平及台南科技工業區為例

近年來各式衝擊不斷，韌性議題受到各界關注。自2010年歐債危機產生以來，歐盟摒棄了過往一味地透過培植高科技產業帶動經濟發展的政策方針，取而代之的是越發關注於既有的在地產業發展，並適當地挹注政策資源。相似地，在韌性的研究中亦闡明，經濟主體的背景結構，是使韌性存在空間異質性的關鍵。基於這樣的思維，本研究將安平工業區與台南科技工業區作為研究對象，首先透過敘述性統計分析，以產業結構及知識與創新角度切入，解析兩者的背景結構差異，並加以比對兩工業區遭受衝擊的影響情形。其次，透過深度訪談，釐清兩工業區當前面臨之差異化課題。最後，以規劃與治理角度，檢視我國當前對於編定工業區的管理及政策投入方針，是否具有回應編定工業區差異化需求之意涵。本研究建議上級機關往後在面臨衝擊時，除提供補助、津貼及租金減免等措施，協助業者渡過衝擊外，更應將危機視為轉機，協助編定工業區打造往後更具韌性的產業發展環境。除此之外，應關注產業園區差異化之背景結構與發展情形，予以契合而具差異化的政策協助。

關鍵字

產業園區；韌性；衝擊

並列摘要

The issue of economic resilience has attracted lots of attention recently. Since 2010, due to the European debt crisis, the European Union abandoned its policy of blindly cultivating high-tech industries to promote economic development. Instead, it has paid more attention to the development of existing local industries and appropriate policy resources. According to this thinking, this study takes Anping and Tainan Technology Industrial Parks as the research objects. First, through narrative statistical analysis, from the perspective of industrial structure and knowledge and innovation, the difference between the structures of the two industrial parks are analyzed. Secondly, through in-depth interviews, we clarify the different issues of the two industrial parks. Finally, from the perspective of planning and governance, we examine whether the current organization and policy input have responding to the different needs of the different industrial parks. This study suggests that in addition to providing subsidies, allowances and rent reduction to help businesses tide over the shocks, they should also treat the crisis as a turning point and assist in industrial parks to create more resilient environment in the future. Besides, attention should be paid to the structure of industrial park differentiation, and appropriate policy assistance should be provided.