透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.138.144
  • 期刊

審議過後-從行政部門觀點探討公民會議的政策連結

After Deliberation: Exploring the Policy Connection of Consensus Conference from Public Sectors' Perspectives

摘要


審議式民主模式經過將近二十年的發展,影響了學界及實務界對於治理過程中政府與民眾之間關係的思維,促成了「以公民為中心的公共管理(citizen-centered public management)」的興起。在理論的充分發展之後,於實際的運作上,審議式民主模式只是紙上談兵的烏托邦?或者是一套可以落實民主續階的策略藍圖?本文透過訪談過去幾年我國委辦公民會議的中央及地方政府相關官員,探索公民會議的參與模式與現行決策模式的磨合,呈現行政官員對於公民會議的態度,以及了解行政機關如何處理公民會議的共識結論,嘗試補充該領域研究的空缺,為理論上的爭議提供部分解答,並為實務界未來推動審議式民主提供建言。

並列摘要


After more than twenty years of development, deliberative democracy has reshaped the thinking regarding the relationship between the state and its citizens. It has also facilitated the rise of citizen-centered public management. As theories of deliberative democracy have gradually become better developed, scholars and practitioners wonder whether the theory is itself an unrealistic utopia or a feasible blueprint for the sustainability of democracy. At issue is how deliberative democracy collaborates with representative democracy. Drawing from transcripts of in-depth interviews with public administrators who took charge of the citizen conferences held between 2003 and 2006, this article attempts to demonstrate the attitudes of political appointees and bureaucrats towards consensus conference and explores the policy impact of the conclusions reached from these conferences. This article would further provide suggestions for practitioners and scholars as well.

參考文獻


林國明、陳東升(2003)。公民會議與審議民主:全民健保的公民參與經驗。台灣社會學。6,61-118。
杜文苓、陳致中(2007)。民眾參與公共決策的反思-以竹科宜蘭基地設置為例。台灣民主季刊。4(3),33-62。
鄧宗業、吳嘉苓(2004)。法人論壇-新興民主國家的公民參與模式。台灣民主季刊。4,35-56。
郭秋永(1999)。強勢民主:新時代的政策參與。問題與研究。38(6),63-93。
Ackerman, Bruce,James Fishkin.(2004).Deliberation Day.New Haven:Yale University Press.

被引用紀錄


方奕仁(2014)。公民參與在證所稅政策過程之角色〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.00113
邱智民(2010)。公民參與科技風險決策之評估:以英國基改作物與食品公共辯論為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.01127
莊瑩君(2011)。從公民科技參與權探討農業生技治理體制〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201100947
許雅筑(2017)。我國技術官僚面對公民參與之回應策略—以細懸浮微粒管制議題為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703607
張玲玲(2017)。代議政治與參與式預算之競合─以臺北市參與式預算為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201702456

延伸閱讀