反思邊界：俄羅斯的觀點與實踐

俄羅斯的疆域遼闊，許多遷徙的規模更甚跨國境的移動。洛特曼透過分析語言及文化形構的歷程，討論個人在空間裡對內、外分際的察覺和實踐。俄羅斯人對於疆界與分界的想像和定義，隨著政權體制與社會結構的變換而有不同的判讀。本文藉觀察帝俄晚期的國家政策與人文活動，探究因戰爭、流放、拓邊等國境之內的「出界」形式，檢視「境／界」的意義在洛特曼描述的狀態裡，呼應巴里巴爾對於邊界成因的關注，兩者之於反思越界這個命題的意義，對於當前少數以國家安全之名施行邊境管制的政策，在面對世界經濟、文化逐漸走向無國界發展的當下，嘗試提煉出值得借鑒的思維。

關鍵字

邊界；全球化；洛特曼；巴里巴爾

並列摘要

In the vast land of Russia, the scale of internal migration is quite demanding. Through his analysis of the boundary in semiosphere, Y. M. Lotman discovered the awareness and practice of differentiation a man senses within and / or outside the space comprised of languages and forces. In Russia, the idea of borders, or boundaries, is subject to change with political regimes and social construction. According to É. Balibar, the end of the Soviet and Eastern bloc indicated a timing for the (re)arrangement of the borders and territories. This paper aims to discover borders formulated by, or resulting from, expedition, resettlement and exile in late imperial Russia. If my intension of building up a conversation between Balibar and Lotman is possible, their views on the question of border / boundary may hint that the purpose of such lines is (un)necessary as we move into a world of a boundless culture and economy.

並列關鍵字

boundary ； globalization ； Y. M. Lotman ； É. Balibar

參考文獻

Horvath, R. J. (1972). A definition of colonialism. Current Anthropology, 13, 1: 45-57.

McReynolds, L. (2002). Russia at play: Leisure activities at the end of the tsarist era. Cornell University Press.

Weiss, C. (2006). Nash: Appropriating Siberia for the Russian empire. Sibirica, 5, 1: 141-155.

王麗娟 (編譯)。(2016年5月5日)。〈公民移居遠東俄送1公頃用地〉。《聯合報》，A13版。(Wang, L.-J. [Ed. & Trans.]. [May 5, 2016]. Reinhabit in the Far East, one hectare of land to be given by the Russian government. UDN News, p. A13.)

Google Scholar

別爾嘉耶夫 (1999)。《俄羅斯的命運》(汪劍釗譯)。雲南人民出版社。(原著1918年出版)。(Berdyaev, N. A. [1999]. The fate of Russia. [J. Z. Wan, Trans.]. Yunnan People’s Publishing House. [Original work published 1918])

Google Scholar

國際替代計量

反思邊界：俄羅斯的觀點與實踐

全文下載

主題瀏覽