透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.96.135
  • 期刊

動態能力文獻之發展軌跡與展望-主路徑分析

The Development Trajectory of Dynamic Capability -Main Path Analysis

摘要


研究目的:本研究回顧動態能力文獻之發展軌跡與展望,尤其是新興學派的演化路徑,提出一種關鍵延伸主路徑分析,用以彌補先前研究之不足。研究設計/方法:本研究以關鍵字“dynamic capabilities"和“dynamic capability"從WOS及Scopus資料庫蒐集文獻,建立引用網絡,並以結合主路徑分析及文獻的文字探勘,找出主要文獻發展軌跡及分岐路徑。研究結果:本研究發現動態能力文獻發展軌跡可分成三個階段:起始、分岐、合併。在分岐階段又有兩個分支:主要的宏觀/集體導向及次要的微觀/認知導向。研究限制/啟發:本研究文獻資料受限於WOS及Scopus資料庫,限縮至管理與商業領域,並限制為期刊論文或回顧文獻,共字分析限制為前一百大語詞。理論/實務/社會意涵:本研究展示出過去的文獻多數集中在宏觀/集體的研究,相對上微觀/認知少被觸及的。這是值得注意與投入,尤其是跨層級的整合。創見/價值:本研究成果對動態能力文獻的研究有所啟發,並在文獻回顧的方法論上提供一個嶄新的方法,可擴及其他領域。

並列摘要


Purpose - This study reviews articles in the dynamic capability (DC) literature and proposes an alternative method, key-route main path analysis, to reduce the effect of sample selection bias in prior research approaches. Design/methodology/approach -This research uses the keywords "dynamic capabilities" and "dynamic capability" to collect literature from the WOS and Scopus databases, building a citation network. By combining the main path analysis and test-mining for literature review, this study reveals the global main path and branch paths. Findings-This study discovers that the development trajectory can be separated into three phases: the initial phase, the diverged phase, and the converged phase. There are two branches in the diverged phase: major main path (Macro/Collected-orientation) and minor secondary main path (Micro/Cognition-orientation). Research limitations/implications -Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus are used for searching the literature, with a limited scope of journal and review articles in management and business fields. The co-word analysis is conducted with top 100 indexing terms. Practical implications/Social implications -This study shows that most previous literature focused much more on macro/collective research than on micro/cognition research. The discovery deserves more attention and further endeavors, especially in cases of cross-level integration. Originality/value -This study contributes to suggest the key-route main path of development trajectories of the DC literature and the same research methodology can be applied to other research fields.

參考文獻


Agarwal, Rajshree and Constance E. Helfat (2009), “Strategic Renewal of Organizations,” Organization Science, 20(2), 281-293.
Argote, Linda and Henrich R. Greve (2007), “A Behavioral Theory of the Firm-40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact,” Organization Science, 18(3), 337-349.
Augier, Mie and David J. Teece (2009), “Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance,” Organization Science, 20(2), 410-421.
Barberá-Tomás, David, Fernando Jiménez-Sáez, and Itziar Castelló-Molina (2011), “Mapping the Importance of the Real World: The Validity of Connectivity Analysis of Patent Citations Networks,” Research Policy, 40(3), 473-486.
Barney, Jay and Teppo Felin (2013), “What Are Microfoundations,” The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 138-155.

延伸閱讀