透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.141.202.54
  • 期刊

資本原始積累與中國大陸的農民工

The Primitive Accumulation of Capital and the Peasant Migrant Workers in Mainland China

摘要


從1978年以來中國大陸所進行的改革開放,已經使得中國大陸日益朝一個資本主義社會方向發展。在資本主義生產方式確立以前,會出塊「資本原始積累」的過程,資本原始積累概念具有兩重意義:一是財富的集中,提供工業化最初資本積累的來源,二是「自由」勞動力的形成,為雇佣勞動生產創造基本的條件。因此在資本原始積累階段,將會出塊大量農民被迫離開土地,成為「自由」的勞動力。 中國大陸原先是一個社會主義社會,因此它目前正在進行的資本原始積累過程勢必有其獨特之處,與資本主義發達國家的經驗非常不一樣,例如英國在資本原始積累過程時採取的是圈地運動的模式強迫農民離開土地,中國大陸卻在此之前先進行了某種形式的分地運動,自然使得農民離開土地的模式會與英國不一樣。本文將從比較的角度探討中國資本原始積累的特色及農民離開土地的模式,分析中國大陸與其他資本主義發達國家發展經驗的差異,進而研究這樣的流動方式對於中國大陸未來資本主義發展的影響。

並列摘要


The reform policy pursued by the Mainland Chinese government since 1978 has transformed the country into an ever more capitalist society. Before any capitalist mode of production is firmly established, there has to be a stage of ”primitive accumulation of capital.” This term carries a dual meaning: on one side there is the concentration of wealth allowing the initial accumulation of capital for industrialization; on the other there is the formation of a ”free” labor force which makes possible production based on wage labor. It is, therefore, often a highly visible character of the stage of the primitive accumulation of capital that large amount of peasants are forced to leave the land to become ”free” laborers. Mainland China has been a socialist society in the past. The process of primitive accumulation of capital that is currently taking place in China, therefore, has to be very different from that in the historical experience of the advanced capitalist countries. Primitive accumulation of capital in England, for example, is characterized by the enclosure movement, which forced peasant farmers to leave the land. China, however, has undergone a movement of land redistribution, which naturally entails a pattern of the separation of peasants from the land that is different from that in England. This article uses comparative studies to explore the patterns of the primitive accumulation of capital and the separation of peasants from the land in China. The Chinese experience will be compared and contrasted with the experience of capitalist development in other capitalist countries. Such analyses can contribute to understanding the future development of capitalism in China.

參考文獻


鄭怡雯(2002)。誰來上崗:中國城市勞動力市場的不平等競爭。台灣社會研究。48,45-94。
吳介民(2000)。壓榨人性辛間:身分差序與中國式多重剝削。台灣社會研究季刊。39,1-44。
黃德北(2006)。國企改革與下崗工人:中國大陸勞動力市場建立的政治經濟分析。東以研究。37(1),1-40。
Aston, T. H.(eds.),C. H. E. Philpin(eds.)(1985).The Brenner Debate: Agrarian class Structure and Economic Development in PreIndustrial Europe.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Bian, Yanjie.(1997).Bringing Strong Ties In: Indirect Ties, Networks Bridges, and Job Searches in China.American Sociological Review.62,266-285.

被引用紀錄


鄧建邦(2017)。受地方限定的工廠:中國大陸內遷台資製造業勞動體制之變遷台灣社會學(33),63-64。https://doi.org/10.6676/TS.2017.33.63
劉秋婉(2013)。中國差序公民權的性別意涵初探-北京家政工的研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.02947
李奕廷(2013)。從中央與地方關係初探廣州農民工社會保障政策推行〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.00373
歐子綺(2009)。樂村:北京五環外一個農民工聚居區的生活、工作與治理〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0016-0207200916271568

延伸閱讀