透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.237.31.131
  • 期刊

「世界化」與「全球化」中的國際關係研究:連結「全球歷史社會學」與「全球國際關係研究」的對話

The Worlding and Globalizing International Relations: Connecting the Dialogue Between Global Historical Sociology and Global International Relations

摘要


國際關係研究是以歐洲為中心的西方國際關係研究,有些學者質疑為何沒有非西方觀點的國際關係研究,遂促使出現更多非西方或後西方的國際關係理論觀點。從亞洲學派開始以本土成長的理論化,進行國際關係理論的世界化與全球化歷程。國際關係理論研究遂出現了「本土成長轉向」或「後西方轉向」,主張國際關係理論應該脫離西方的觀點,以本土成長或後西方的觀點發展國際關係理論。藉由廣泛地檢視及批判西方國際關係理論,要發展非西方或後西方國際關係理論,或是「去除(歐洲)中心化國際關係」或「世界化國際關係」,進而推動超越西方和非西方的「全球國際關係研究」。既有的「國際關係歷史社會學」或「全球歷史社會學」理論批判西方歐洲中心主義、西方與非西方權力不對稱,主張各文明之間對話、全球社會轉型與分殊化等基本概念與觀點,提供了「全球國際關係研究」反思批判西方國際關係研究的後設理論觀點,吸納非西方歷史社會的經驗與觀點,顯示其與「全球國際關係研究」的相同主張,作為探討連結兩者對話的基礎,以擴展國際關係研究的深度與廣度,從西方歐美、非西方、後西方走向全球研究層次的內容發展。

並列摘要


International Relations (IR) is the Western International Relations Theory (IRT) based on the development of Eurocentric world politics. Some scholars have questioned "why there is no Non-Western International Relations". It has promoted more scholars to provide more Non-Western or Post-Western approaches into IR. Starting from the Asian School with homegrown theorizing, the IR is ongoing a worlding and globalizing process to Global International Relations (GIR). Therefore, there is a "homegrown turn" or "Post-Western turn" in the IRT, to advocate IRT should break away from Western perspectives and to develop on the homegrown, local or post-western perspectives. Scholars widely reviewed and criticize the Western IR, not only searching for building the Non-Western IR which has always been existed in, but also developing the Non-Western or Post-Western IR, or decentering IR or (re)worlding IR, to promote the GIR. With the International Relations and Historical Sociology (IRHS) or Global Historical Sociology (GHS)'s basic concepts and perspectives such as critique the Western Eurocentrism, the unbalance of power in the West between Non-West, the dialogues among civilizations, the transformation and differentiation of global society, to connect the dialogue between GIR and GHS to extend the breadth and depth of IR, from the Western, Non-Western, Post-Western toward to Global levels and contents.

參考文獻


郭雪真,2019,〈國際關係歷史社會學的理論:發展與批判〉,《政治學報》,第68期,頁75-108。doi:10.6229/CPSR.201912_(68).0003。
余家哲、李政鴻,2009,〈歷史社會學與國際關係理論的交會:歷史社會學的國家理論〉,《政治科學論叢》,第40期,127-152。doi:10.6166/TJPS.40(127-152)。
郭雪真,2013,〈國際關係歷史社會學理論的發展與評析〉,《問題與研究》,第52卷第3期,頁63-96。doi:10.30390/ISC.201309_52(3).0003。
Rösch, F., & Watanabe, A., 2017. “Approaching the Unsynthesizable in International Politics: Giving Substance to Security Discourses through Basso Ostinato?” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 609-629. doi:10.1177/1354066116656764.
Shahi, D., 2018. Advaita as a Global International Relations Theory. London, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351018036.

延伸閱讀