透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.58.39.23
  • 期刊

三種不同放射治療技術之全腦及脊髓照射誘發二次癌症危險度分析

Retrospective evaluationof secondary cancer risksby three radiation therapy techniques incranio-spinal irradiation

摘要


研究目的:比較三維順形放射治療技術(three dimension conformal radiation therapy, 3D-CRT)、強度調控放射治療(intensity modulation radiation therapy, IMRT)及體積調控弧形放射治療(volumetric-modulated arc therapy, VMAT)三種治療技術利用器官等效劑量(organ equivalent dose, OED)分析建立二次癌症的風險評估模型,以得到額外絕對危險度(Excess absolute risk, EAR)。材料與方法:選取2010年3月至2016年2月間接受全腦脊髓照射(craniospinal irradiation, CSI)治療的五位病患做為研究對象。規劃3D-CRT、IMRT及VMAT三種不同之治療計畫,將治療計畫所得之劑量體積直方圖(dose-volume histogram, DVH)資料輸出,執行器官等效劑量(OED)之參數計算,建立額外絕對危險度(EAR)之三種模型,用以評估因放射治療所誘發之二次癌症機率。結果:VMAT較3D-CRT及IMRT顯著的減少特定危急器官之平均劑量。在額外絕對危險度(EAR)評估結果中顯示,在全腦脊髓照射中引起小腸(small intestine)二次癌症之額外絕對危險度為每萬人中大於50人,其中以3D-CRT之治療技術評估結果為最高;肺部(Lungs)二次癌症之額外絕對危險度為每萬人中大於30人,以VMAT之治療技術評估結果為最高。在肝臟及口腔二次癌症之額外絕對危險度為每萬人中小於10人以內,機率極低。結論:本研究為首篇針對全腦脊髓照射(CSI)三種不同之技術進行劑量學之差異比較,並建立台灣本地接受CSI放射治療患者二次癌症危險度參數,提供臨床治療規劃之二次癌症危險度參考指標。

並列摘要


Purpose: To compare the secondary cancer risk (SCR) in cranio-spinal irradiation for three radiotherapy-planning techniques, namely, three dimension conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The SCRmodel was established by usingthe organ equivalent dose (OED) to calculate the value of extra absolute risk (EAR). Materials & Methods: In total five patients were included who underwent cranio-spinal irradiation between March 2010 and February 2016 in our hospital. Three different treatment plans were created including 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) obtained was used to calculate OED and SCR. Three SCR models established can be utilized to evaluate secondary cancer risks after cranio-spinal irradiation. Results: The highest EAR value in small intestine was greater than 50 for 3D-CRT; as well as in lung was greater than 30 (per 10,000/per year) for VMAT. However, the EAR values in liver and oral cavity were less than 10 (per 10,000/per year) for the three techniques. Conclusion: This is the first study to establish the EAR parameters and evaluation of SCRs by three radiotherapy-planning techniques in cranio-spinal irradiation in Taiwan. The result can be used as a clinical reference for evaluating secondary malignancy risks after radiation therapy.

延伸閱讀