《春秋》三《傳》讓國史事研究

A study of the history of abandon the throne on the three Commentaries of the ＂Chunqiu＂

諸葛俊元(Chuke, Chun-Yuan)

《宗教哲學》 95期 (2021/03) Pp. 1-26

https://doi.org/10.6309/JORP.202103_(95).0001

摘要

《春秋》三《傳》記錄讓國史事並不多，且國君或公子讓國的時空背景亦不相同。從三《傳》的記錄方式來看，對嫡子繼承制的堅持是讓國成立的關鍵。但從當事人的言論看來，個人的品德才能以及能否利於國家卻是形成讓國事件的主因。雖然最終結果通常都是嫡子繼承制得到勝利，但在讓國的過程中，亦表明春秋時代的嫡子繼承制度正受到衝擊而產生動搖。

關鍵字

讓國 ； 禪讓 ； 嫡子繼承制

並列摘要

The three Commentaries of the ＂Chunqiu (Spring and Autumn Annals)＂ records some history about the abandon the throne. And different spatial-temporal environments have different results. Judging from the recording method of the three Commentaries, Kings and princes can successfully abandon the throne, because it can adhere to the eldest son inheritance system. However, judging from Kings and princes, possess character and talent, and is good for the country, the discussion that caused the abandonment of the throne. Usually the victory of the eldest son's succession system. But the process of discussion indicated that the eldest son's inheritance system in the Spring and Autumn Period was challenged.

並列關鍵字

Abandon the throne ； demise ； Eldest son inheritance system