透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.149.242
  • 期刊

中國認知領域作戰模型初探:以2020臺灣選舉為例

The Chinese Cognitive Warfare Model: The 2020 Taiwan Election

摘要


為深入研究中國認知領域作戰之意涵,本研究使用網路攻擊常見的鑽石模型,試圖描繪出資訊作戰「發動者」,以及其「攻擊模式」。首先,本研究整理2019年5月至2020年1月的數據約32萬筆,列出2020臺灣大選期間資訊的異常現象,並比照現有研究及訪談資料,找尋可能的認知領域作戰痕跡。根據本研究整理,認知領域作戰有四種完全不同的模式:外宣模式、粉紅模式、農場模式,以及協力模式。面對四種不同型態的威脅,臺灣應立即針對各威脅建立防禦機制與法制,以抵擋中國的認知作戰。

並列摘要


This research paper applies the extended diamond model in an attempt to illustrate Chinese cognitive warfare waged against Taiwan during the 2020 election. The paper is informed by 320,000 pieces of data, collected between May 1, 2019 and January 31, 2020, that demonstrate abnormalities on the Internet and the attribution of these abnormalities to possible players in China. According to the data collected, four different attack models existed during the 2020 election: the propaganda model, the pink model, the content farm model, and the collaboration model. This paper suggests that we need different defensive mechanisms to counterattack information operations from China.

參考文獻


Giglietto, Fabio, Nicola Righetti, & Giada Marino, 2019/1/15. “Understanding Coordinated and Inauthentic Link Sharing Behavior on Facebook in the Run-up of 2018 General Election and 2019 European Election in Italy,” OII, .
喬良、王湘穗,1999。《超限戰:兩個空軍大校對全球化時代戰爭與戰法的想定》。北京:解放軍文藝出版社。
何清漣,2019。《紅色滲透》。臺北:八旗文化。
沈偉光,2003。《新戰爭論》。杭州:浙江大學。
林中斌,1999。《核霸:透視跨世紀中共戰略武力》。臺北:臺灣學生書局。

延伸閱讀