CDIO體育課程設計與傳統體育課程設計對大專生學習成效之比較

Comparison Between CDIO Physical Education Course Design and Traditional Physical Education Course Design of College Students' Learning Effectiveness

王亭文(Ting-Wen Wang)

《大專體育學刊》 24卷2期 (2022/06) Pp. 204-220

https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.202206_24(2).0004

摘要

本研究之目的為檢驗conceive-design-implement-operate（CDIO）體育課程設計，對大學生自我導向學習、創意自我效能與學習投入的成效。以立意取樣選取兩班學生共計110位進行不同課程設計，並以二因子混合設計變異數分析驗證研究目的（課程設計×前後測）。研究結果顯示：不同課程設計在自我導向學習、創意自我效能與學習投入前後測結果皆達交互作用；進一步以單純主要效果分析發現，不同課程設計在3種學習成效前測無顯著差異；但在後測皆達顯著差異，顯示參與CDIO體育課程設計學生的自我導向學習、創意自我效能與學習投入優於傳統體育課程設計。本研究結論認為相較於傳統體育課程設計，CDIO體育課程設計確實能提升大學生運動知能以外的特質與能力，對學生未來課程學習有正向影響，建議大專體育教師可使用CDIO體育課程設計，介入部分課程安排，協助學生有多元的學習成效。

關鍵字

自我導向學習 ； 創意自我效能 ； 學習投入

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the conceive-design-implement-operate (CDIO) physical education course design for college students' self-directed learning, creative self-efficacy, and learning engagement. Two classes of a total of 110 students were selected for different course designs with purposive sampling, and two-factor mixed design variance analysis was used to verify the purpose of the study (course design × pre-test). The results showed that different course designs had an interactive effect on self-directed learning, creative self-efficacy, and learning engagement on pretest-posttest results. Further analysis of the simple main effect found that there were no significant differences in the three pre-tests of self-directed learning, creative self-efficacy, and learning engagement. However, there were significant differences in the post-test, indicating that the self-directed learning, creative self-efficacy, and learning engagement of students participating in CDIO physical education course design were better than those in the traditional physical education course design. In conclusion, this study found that, compared with traditional physical education course design, CDIO physical education course design could improve college students' traits and abilities other than sports knowledge, which has a positive impact on students' future curriculum study. The study recommends that college physical education teachers integrate the CDIO physical education course design to assist students to achieve multiple learning results.

並列關鍵字

self-directed learning ； creative self-efficacy ； learning engagement

參考文獻

蘇美禎（2021）。以多元互動式教學結合自我導向與合作學習於研究概論課程之應用與實踐。教學實踐與創新，4 卷 1 期，79-124 頁。doi: 10.3966/261654492021030401003[Su, M.-C. (2021). Application and practice of multi-interactive teaching combined with selfdirected and cooperative learning in a research methodology course. Journal of Teaching Practice and Pedagogical Innovation, 4(1), 79-124. doi: 10.3966/261654492021030401003]

謝如梅（2020）。跨域團隊創意實踐與自主學習的挑戰。大學教學實務與研究學刊，4 卷 1 期，113-140 頁。doi: 10.6870/JTPRHE.202006_4(1). 0004[ Hsieh, R.-M. (2020). The challenges of interdisciplinary teams’ creative practice and self-regulated learning. Journal of Teaching Practice and Research on Higher Education, 4(1), 113-140。doi: 10.6870/JTPRHE.202006_4(1).0004]

周建智（2011）。運動促進學童之創造力。學校體育，123 期，31-36 頁。doi: 10.29937/PES.2011 04.0006[Chou, C.-C. (2011). Sports promote the creativity in school children. Physical Education of School, 123, 31-36. doi: 10.29937/PES.201104.0006]

黃月嬋（2005）。體育教學創新與師資培育。學校體育，86 期，34-38 頁。doi: 10.29937/PES.200502.0006[Huang, Y.-C. (2005). Innovation in physical education teaching and training of teachers. Physical Education of School, 86, 34-38. doi: 10.29937/PES.200502.0006]

吳宛臻（2017）。動手做課程對高中生創造力影響之研究─以智高機器人為例。工業科技教育學刊，10 期，47-60 頁。doi: 10.6306/JITE.201711_(10).0004[Wu, W.-Z. (2017). The creativity of senior high students through hands-on teaching project of Gigo Robot activities. Journal of Industrial Technology Education, 10, 47-60. doi: 10.6306/JITE.201711_(10).0004]