透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.17.28.48
  • 期刊

臺灣社會科學獲補助國際期刊論文之特性探討

Exploring the Patterns of Funded Papers in Social Science in Taiwan

摘要


本研究以書目計量分析臺灣社會科學獲補助國際期刊論文之特性,從論文數、研究補助率、文獻類型、領域、發表機構類型、期刊影響力、以及論文影響力等特性探討。研究結果顯示臺灣社會科學國際期刊獲補助論文數及研究補助率均有逐年成長的趨勢。非傳統社會科學的跨學科領域之研究補助率特別高,而傳統社會科學領域中,以教育與教育研究領域的獲補助論文數與研究補助率都是最高的,但經濟、管理學、以及商業領域的獲補助論文雖多,但研究補助率卻相對較低。整體來說,獲補助論文有較高的論文引用影響力,但社會科學內不同領域的差異甚大,仍需考量領域的差異。總而言之,經費補助對臺灣社會科學國際期刊論文的發表數量及影響力均有正向的鼓勵作用。

並列摘要


This study used bibliometrics to analyze the characteristics of funded papers in the social sciences in Taiwan from 2015 to 2019, including the number of funded papers, funded paper ratio, document types, fields, type of publishing organizations, journal impact, and paper citation impact. The results indicate that the number of funded papers and the funded paper ratio of SSCI papers from Taiwan have both increased. In addition to articles and reviews, conference papers are a major type of funded paper for local SSCI papers. In terms of fields, the nontraditional social sciences, such as environmental sciences, psychiatry, and public/environmental & occupational health, have a particularly high funded paper ratio. However, the number of funded papers and funded paper ratio is the highest in the field of education & educational research. The fields of economics, management, and business have a large number of funded papers but a low funded paper ratio. Universities are the main funded institutions, but hospitals have the highest funded paper ratio. Funded papers tend to have higher paper citation impacts. Therefore, funding positively affects the productivity and impact of SSCI papers from Taiwan.

參考文獻


張郁蔚(2010)。臺灣與日本雙邊科學合作之探討:2000-2009年合著論文之書目計量研究。圖書資訊學刊,8(2),55-93。doi: 10.6182/jlis.2010.8(2).055【Chang, Yu-Wei (2010). Bi-lateral scientific collaboration between Taiwan and Japan: A bibliometric study of coauthored articles during 2000-2009. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 8(2), 55-93. doi: 10.6182/jlis.2010.8(2).055 (in Chinese)】
Abt, H. A. (1984). Citations to federally-funded and unfunded research. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 96(581), 563-565. doi: 10.1086/131381
Álvarez-Bornstein, B., Díaz-Faes, A. A., & Bordons, M. (2019). What characterises funded biomedical research? Evidence from a basic and a clinical domain. Scientometrics, 119(2), 805-825. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03066-3
Álvarez-Bornstein, B., Morillo, F., & Bordons, M. (2017). Funding acknowledgments in the Web of Science: Completeness and accuracy of collected data. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1793-1812. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2453-4
Benavente, J. M., Crespi, G., Figal Garone, L., & Maffioli, A. (2012). The impact of national research funds: A regression discontinuity approach to the Chilean FONDECYT. Research Policy, 41(8), 1461-1475. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.007

延伸閱讀