申論「信則有，不信則無」之深義

An Inquiry into "Reality Goes after Believing and Unreality Goes after Unbelieving"

楊中傑(Chung-Chieh Yang)

《佛學與科學》 3卷2期 (2002/07) Pp. 80-90

https://doi.org/10.30162/BS.200207.0008

摘要

世間現象究竟是否「信則有，不信則無」？信的內涵究竟為啥？「信、不信」的運作原理究為如何？吾人可由深入「信」的運作機制而了解世間「真實」之實相，以及哲學「主體」與「客體」之實相；並由此推論宇宙一切一切，從哲學、科學，到宗教，似皆無法免除「信則有，不信則無」之命題。然而在佛學研究裡，卻有一無以名狀之物能超越「信則有，不信則無」之框架。

關鍵字

信 ； 實相 ； 哲學 ； 科學 ； 宗教 ； 自性

並列摘要

Is supposition “Reality goes after believing and unreality goes after unbelieving” the law for us to face whichever phenomena in the world? What is the immanence of believing? How does believing act? By studying the operation mechanism of believing, the reality of the truth can be realized and the meaning of the reality of the philosophic “subject” and “object” can be understood. Furthermore, it can be inferred that everything in the world ranging from philosophy, science to religion cannot escape from the constraint of this supposition. Only in Buddhism is there one thing that cannot be named can free from this supposition.

並列關鍵字

believing ； reality ； philosophy ； science ； religion ； self-nature