本研究以內容分析法調查台灣四家報紙在2016年總統大選期間,如何在選舉報導中挪用UGC,結果發現報紙加入UGC並未改變選舉新聞的題材與偏向,反而是在既有的慣例與解釋框架下,收編UGC為報社所用。首先,就UGC的挪用數量來看,四報在選舉期間並未特別重視UGC,在5個月中僅出現183則,且以每日一則、每則一段和二段為主。另在引用目的和呈現方式上,四報都偏重在「提供意見」,且以匿名化、概括化、模糊化的方式呈現網友,試圖將網友意見指代為網路公眾意見。其次,就UGC的政治表現來看,四報在報導上仍偏向「競選遊戲類」主題,且傾向採用「有限框架」和「多元-封閉框架」,導致選舉報導加入UGC,仍未脫離主流媒體固有的報導模式。
This study content analyzed Taiwan's four major newspapers' user-generated content (UGC) in their coverage of the 2016 presidential election. Results showed that news reports appeared to remain biased while incorporating the UGC into their routines and interpretive frames. However, the use of UGC during the election was not extensive, with only 183 pieces in five months, approximately one piece per day, and no more than two paragraphs apiece. Specifically, the UGC in the four newspapers was found to serve as the "opinions" and "images" of the internet users as the abstract, vague and anonymous public. In addition, UGC was driven toward the "campaign games (horse racing news)," preferring the "restricted frame" and "plural-closed frame" to other news frames in the political contest.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。