透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.175.180
  • 期刊

苗栗地區高中職學生體育課學習滿意度之研究

A Study on High School and Vocational School Students' Learning Satisfaction of Physical Education in Miaoli Area

摘要


本研究之目的在於瞭解:一、苗栗地區高中、職學生體育課學習滿意度之現況;二、探討不同背景變項之學生在體育課學習滿意度之差異情形。資料處理採描述統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析與雪費法事後比較。 本研究主要結論為: 一、苗栗地區高中職學生對體育課學習滿意度的表現程度大致良好;在學生學習滿意度因素中又以班級氣氛最為滿意,其次依序為教師教學,學校行政以及場地器材。 二、不同性別之學生體育課學習滿意度整體表現及教師教學、場地器材及學校行政等三個構面達顯著差異,且男生高於女生。 三、不同年級之學生體育課學習滿意度整體表現及各分量表因素構面均達顯著差異。愈低年級學生對於體育課的滿意程度愈高。 四、不同學校屬性之學生體育課學習滿意度整體表現及教師教學、場地器材及學校行政等三個構面達顯著差異。公立高職學生體育課學習滿意度均高於其他不同屬性之學校;而綜合高中的體育課學習滿意度最低。 五、不同學校規模之學生體育課學習滿意度整體表現及場地器材構面達顯著差異,中型規模(19~40班)學校高於小型規模(18班以下)學校。 六、不同區域之學生體育課學習滿意度整體表現及教師教學及班級氣氛等兩個構面均達顯著差異,且鄉鎮高於都市。

並列摘要


The objectives of this study are: 1) to understand the learning satisfaction of senior high school and vocational school students in Miaoli area on physical education classes; 2) to discuss the learning satisfaction of students with different backgrounds. variable physical education classes. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, independent t-test, and one-way ANOVA, and Scheffe post-hoc comparison. The conclusions are: 1. Senior high school and vocational school students in Miaoli area are satisfactory on physical education classes; of the satisfactory factors, class environment is rated the highest, followed by teaching approach, school administration, and facility. 2. Gender factor shows significant difference in overall satisfaction and satisfaction on teaching approach, facility, and school administration; male students show higher satisfaction than female students do. 3. Grade level shows higher overall satisfaction and satisfaction in all aspects; junior students show higher satisfaction than senior students do. 4. School administration shows significant difference in overall satisfaction and satisfaction on teaching approach, facility, and school administration; students of public vocational schools show higher satisfaction than students of other types of schools, and students of composite high school show the lowest satisfaction. 5. School scale shows significant difference in overall satisfaction and satisfaction on facility; students of medium scale school (19~40 classes) show higher satisfaction than students of small-scale school (below 18 classes). 6. Regional factor shows significant difference in overall satisfaction and satisfaction on teaching approach and class environment; students in rural area show higher satisfaction than students in urban area.

參考文獻


Domer, D.E.(1983).Understanding educational satisfaction.(Understanding educational satisfaction).,未出版Eric Document Reproduction Service.
吳婉如(1993)。臺灣地區長青學苑教師教學型態與學員學習滿意度研究。社會教育學刊。22,211-225。
卓旻怡(1999)。雲林縣國中生體育課學習滿意度調查研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院體育研究所。
馬芳婷(1989)。我國社教機構短期研習班教師教學行為與學生學習滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育研究所。
張思敏(1995)。課程設計及教學配合之探討。大專體育。17,59-65。

被引用紀錄


蕭智聰(2012)。高職產學攜手合作計畫專班學生學習滿意度之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2012.00476
孫鈺喬、陳俐文、陳棟樑(2021)。運用科技接受模式探討使用Microsoft Teams進行遠距教學之學生學習滿意度兩岸職業教育論叢5(1),37-52。https://doi.org/10.6685/ASVEJ.202110_5(1).0004
盧瑞清(2011)。體育性社團活動學習動機與學習滿意度之相關研究~以高屏地區高職羽球社學生為例〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2011.00045

延伸閱讀