防禦悲觀者、樂觀者及悲觀者在焦慮及反思策略之差異：高／低任務難度及工具性之調節效果

本研究目的在考驗防禦悲觀者、樂觀者及悲觀者在焦慮管理及反思策略上差異，並考驗在高／低任務難度及工具性之調節下，防禦悲觀者之積極反思策略是否彰顯。研究對象以120名學生為受試者，隨機分派至高工具／高難度、高工具／低難度、低工具／高難度、低工具／低難度等四種任務組別，經成就測驗後再施測反思策略量表。統計分析採t考驗、變異數分析及共變數分析，並以Cohen's d考驗三組受試者在反思策略的變化效果。研究結果顯示：防禦悲觀者、樂觀者及悲觀者在焦慮及反思策略上之考驗達顯著差異；高工具性任務是促使防禦悲觀者採取反思策略之重要因素；高難度任務並無法彰顯防禦悲觀者使用反思策略之時機。本研究並根據研究結果進行討論及提出建議。

關鍵字

工具知覺；反思策略；任務難度；防禦性悲觀；焦慮

並列摘要

The purpose of this study tested the effect of defensive pessimism on anxiety and reflectivity. Furthermore, this study attempted to test the interaction between perceived instrument and task difficulty on reflectivity. Data were collected from 120 students and randomly assigned to four groups. Statistical significance was tested by t test, two-way ANOVA and ANCOVA. The results of this study were as follows: (1) Defensive pessimist, optimist, and pessimist showed statistical differences on anxiety and reflectivity. (2) High instrument task was an important factor for defensive pessimist using reflectivity. (3) High difficulty task didn't appear effective on the use of reflectivity. Implications for theory, practice and research are discussed.

並列關鍵字

anxiety ； defensive pessimist ； perceived instrument ； reflectivity ； task difficulty

參考文獻

李介至(2007)。自我保護策略之認知歸因取向及其與內外化行爲之關係：高／低因果不確定組別之等同比較。中華輔導學報。22，33-70。

李介至(2005)。護專學生防禦性悲觀對內外科學習焦慮及精熟投入之作用效果評估。中華輔導學報。18，121-152。

李介至(2004)。護專學生防禦性悲觀、自我跛足策略及避免處置作爲對其內外科學業成就之影響。醫護科技學刊。6(4)，293-313。

Aunola, K.,Stattin, H.,Nurmi, J. E.(2000).Adolescents' achievement strategies, school adjustment, and externalizing and internalizing problem behaviors.Journal of Youth and Adolescence.29,289-306.

Google Scholar

Avila, C.(2001).Distinguishing BIS-mediated and BAS-mediated disinheriting mechanisms.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.80,311-324.

Google Scholar

國際替代計量

防禦悲觀者、樂觀者及悲觀者在焦慮及反思策略之差異：高／低任務難度及工具性之調節效果

全文下載

主題瀏覽