在反思中成長：華語文教學師資培育實務性課程設計與實踐

GROW IN REFLECTION: DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING THE PRACTICAL COURSE FOR CHINESE LANGUAGE TEACHER TRAINING

張金蘭(Chang, Ching-Lan)

《當代教育研究季刊》 30卷3期 (2022/09) Pp. 5-38

https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202209_30(3).0001

摘要

研究目的：本研究以反思為主線，目的在使華語文教學師資生運用所學之教學知能於教學現場。研究設計／方法／取徑：研究者為解決在教學現場發現的問題，採取「計畫、行動、觀察、反思」循環之行動研究法。以Wallace（1991）的「反思性師培模型」為基礎，在18週教學時間中設計與實施課程。研究對象為修習研究者所教授「華語文課程與教學設計研究」之華語文教學碩士班研究生9位，真實教學學生來源為就讀於北區某大學之外籍學生23名。採取以質性為主、量化為輔的研究方法。師資生需將理論知識與經驗知識相互印證、靠練習來發展行動所得的知識，再與觀察所得的知識相互對照，透過「練習、反思、再練習、再反思」不斷循環以獲得華語文教學專業知能。研究發現或結論：研究結果有二：一是建立以反思為主的華語文教學實務課程，二是師資生在參與此課程後，教學專業知能獲得增長。根據質性資料發現，師資生在態度方面能透過反思主動學習，在知識方面能透過反思獲取知識，在技能方面能透過反思運用所學，在自我意識方面能透過反思了解自我，以達到Ⓐ+ASK的課程目標。由量化資料發現，師資生在參與本課程後，在課程滿意度方面，學生學習成果導向問卷之平均數為4.90，為研究者所開設三次課程中最高者，且較全系、全院、全校，以及全校碩士班課程之平均數為高，顯示師資生的對本課程的滿意度極高。研究原創性／價值：本研究主要的意義與價值有二：在學術研究上，除了發展課程教學模式外，更能結合理論與實務；在教學實務上，則是能具體將理論在教學現場落實。具體的研究結果可供華語文教學系所開設此類課程參考。教育政策建議或實務意涵：建議強化華語文教學師資培育課程的橫向與縱向合作，邀請校內、校外教授華語文教學實務課程之教師共同參與，使課程設計與實施更加完善。相關研究成果應要回饋於教學現場，並且可在教學現場重現。最終希望能夠改善教學實務、落實教學理論、激發研究者與教學者的對話與共鳴。

關鍵字

華語師資培育 ； 華語教學實務性課程 ； 反思性師培模型 ； 行動研究

並列摘要

Purpose: To enable students who receive training to be Chinese language teachers to apply what they learn in their teaching professions through reflection. Design/methodology/approach: This action study employed the cycle of ＂planning, acting, observing, and reflecting＂ to solve the problems identified in classrooms. A course was designed and implemented over an 18-week period of teacher training on the basis of the reflective model of teacher education (Wallace, 1991). The participants were 9 students from the graduate program of teaching Chinese as a second language, who were enrolled in the Chinese language curriculum design research course led by the investigator. The students being taught by the participants were 23 foreign students from a university in northern Taiwan. This study was a qualitative study with a supplementary quantitative research process. The participants were required to verify theoretical knowledge with experiential knowledge, develop their knowledge through practical actions, and compare this practical knowledge with the knowledge earned from observations. Thus, the participants earned professional knowledge on Chinese language teaching through the repeated cycle of ＂practicing and reflecting.＂ Findings/results: In this study, a reflection-based Chinese language teaching practical course was established, and the participants acquired their professional teaching knowledge and skills after participating in the course. The qualitative data revealed that the participants learned proactively, acquired knowledge, applied what they learned, and understood themselves through reflections, achieving the goals of the Ⓐ +ASK course. The quantitative data indicated that these participants scored an average of 4.90 on their course satisfaction in the questionnaire centering on learning outcomes. This score was the highest out of all the three courses opened by the investigator. The average satisfaction score was also higher than any of the other courses in the department, in the college, in the university, and in the graduate program. Accordingly, the participants were extremely satisfied with the course. Originality/value: There are two aspects of the meanings and values of this study. Not only do the results of this study provide a basis for course model development, but they also enable students trained to be teachers to incorporate theoretical learnings in teaching practices. The results of this study provide a key reference for designing Chinese language teaching practical courses. Suggestions/implications: Horizontal and vertical connections of Chinese language teacher training courses should be reinforced. Specifically, professors within and outside universities should be invited to coparticipate in improving the design and implementation of Chinese language teaching practical courses. Research results should be reflected and reproduced in the classroom environment. The results of this study are expected to improve teaching practice, facilitate the implementation of education theories, and stimulate the dialogue and resonance between researchers and instructors.

並列關鍵字

mandarin teacher training ； mandarin teaching practical course ； reflective teacher training model ； action research

參考文獻

王路江（2008）。漢語國際推廣與對外漢語研究生的創新。學位與研究生教育，49-50。[Wang, L. J. (2008). Innovation of international promotion of Chinese and master of teaching Chinese as second language. Degree and Postgraduate Education, 49-50.]

中華民國教育部（2021）。2021 年教育部對外華語教學能力認證考試簡。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2500/News_Content.aspx?n=D6C383FCEBE5343C&sms=EA01A381F204F203&s=8C36A1C6BE529B0F[Ministry of Education of the Republic of China (2021). The 2021 Ministry of Education certification examination for teaching Chinese as a foreign language. https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2500/News_Content.aspx?n=D6C383FCEBE5343C&sms=EA01A381F204F203&s=8C36A1C6BE529B0F]

孔子學院總部、國家漢辦（2015）。國際漢語教師證書考試大綱。人民出版社。[Headquarter of Confucius Institute & Hanban (2015). Test syllabus interpretation for international Chinese language teacher certificate. People’s Press.]

方麗娜（2013）。臺灣華語文教育的師資培育（上）：學位教育（含學位學程）。載於國家教育研究院編，臺灣華語文教育發展史（頁 181-208）。國家教育研究院。[Fang, L. N. (2013). Teacher training for education of Chinese as second language in Taiwan (book 1): Degree education (bachelor included). In National Academy for Education Research (Eds.), Development history of teaching Chinese as second language (pp.181-208). National Academy for Education Research,]

宋如瑜（2011）。發展華語文實習教師多元評量能力的行動研究。中原華語文學報，7，57-108。[Song, R. Y. (2011). Action research on developing CFL student teachers’competencies of multiple assessment. Chung Yuan Journal of Teaching Chinese as a Second Language, 7, 57-108.]