透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.216.94.152
  • 期刊

認真性休閒量表中文化與驗證:水域活動為例

Validation of the Chinese version of the serious leisure scale for assessing the quality of recreational water activities

摘要


由Gould, Moore, McGuire, 與 Stebbins(2008)所發展的認真性休閒量表(Serious Leisure Inventory and Measure, SLIM)是近年研究認真性休閒特質的重要工具之一。目的:本研究是參考SLIM以編制一份適合國內的認真性休閒特質測量工具。方法:本研究分三階段進行,第一階段以SLIM量表為藍本進行題目的中文化編制;第二階段為第一次資料收集與分析,藉此了解其建構效度和整體配適度;第三階段則為第二次資料蒐集與分析,再次檢視量表的合理性,並進行效標關聯效度與測量恆等性檢定。主要統計方法為驗證性因素分析及簡單相關分析。結果:第一階段翻譯編製的量表題項共計54題;第二階段共獲得有效問卷214份,透過競爭模式比較,發現18因素的斜交結構符合模型適配指標,潛在變項的關係、建構效度及整體適配度獲得支持;第三階段則對219份有效問卷進行分析,結果顯示量表具備可接受的組合信度、區別效度及效標關聯效度,且具跨男性與女性的測量恆等性。結論:本研究之認真性休閒量表為信度與效度指標良好的測量工具,適用於運動休閒領域中認真性休閒特質之測量。

並列摘要


Developed by Gould et al. (2008), the Serious Leisure Inventory and Measure (SLIM) is an important tool for assessing the quality of serious leisure activities. Purpose: This study explored the feasibility of building, based on the SLIM, a scale for evaluating what traits recreational water activities in Taiwan possess. Methods: This study was divided into three phases. The first phase was devoted to selecting the items to be included in our scale, modeling it on the SLIM. At the second phase, we collected and analyzed data with a view to testing the construct validity and goodness of fit of our scale. We collected and analyzed data for a second time in the third phase, with an emphasis placed on examining the criterion-related validity and measurement invariance of the scale. The statistical analyses conducted in the study included confirmatory factor analyses and simple correlation. Results: The main results were: 1) 54 items were included in our scale; 2) Through a comparison of competitive models with 214 effective questionnaires, we found an 18-factor conceptualization of the instrument attested to the good fit of the model. The relationships between the latent variables, the construct validity and the test of goodness-of-fit were all supported; 3) The composite reliability, discriminant validity and criterion-related validity of our scale were acceptable in the third phase with 219 effective questionnaires. Importantly, factorial invariance of this scale was observed across male and female subjects. Conclusion: Our serious leisure scale is a useful tool for identifying serious leisure characteristics.

參考文獻


中華民國交通部觀光局 (2017)。2016 年國人旅遊狀況調查。資料取自 http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/statistics/market.aspx?no=133
王志宏、張繼文 (2013)。認真性休閒與遊憩專門化之關係:社會資本之中介效果。戶外遊憩研究,26(1),105-134。
梁英文、曹勝雄 (2007)。認真休閒與場所依戀的關係:遊憩專門化扮演的角色。戶外遊憩研究,20(3),1-24。
許建民、丁志堅、徐嬿琇 (2018)。自行車認真休閒者遊憩專門化進展歷程研究。臺灣體育運動管理學報,18(1),53-87。
陳其昌、張婷婷 (2009)。攀岩活動參與者休閒動機與深度休閒之關係。大專體育學刊,11(4),69-80。

延伸閱讀