中文版遠距聯想測驗在創造力研究之應用：回顧與展望

The Application of the Chinese Version of Remote Associates Tests in Creativity Research: A Review and Prospect

陳姵臻(Pei-Zhen Chen) ； 吳清麟(Ching-Lin Wu) ； 張雨霖(Yu-Lin Chang) ； 黃博聖(Po-Sheng Huang) ； 林緯倫(Wei-Lun Lin) ； 陳學志(Hsueh-Chih Chen)

《教育實踐與研究》 34卷1期 (2021/06) Pp. 1-44

摘要

創造力係教育領域持續關注的研究主題之一。遠距聯想測驗（Remote Associates Test, RAT）可有效評估創造思考教學成效。該測驗具計分客觀且施測時間較短的特性，應用於華人創造力研究已近20年。本研究統整自2000年以中文版遠距聯想測驗為工具之43篇期刊論文，針對研究目的分四個部分：不同版本之發展與比較、創造性問題解決歷程之探究、影響遠距聯想測驗表現之相關因素、不同介入成效之評估。結果顯示中文版遠距聯想測驗對應中文字層次（部件、字彙、詞彙）有三種版本，且廣泛應用於探討創造思考歷程。行為與認知神經科學研究結果皆指出個體在遠距聯想測驗的解題歷程必須跳脫框架、轉換問題表徵。同時，研究亦發現操弄內、外在因素皆有效改善遠距聯想表現。據此，建議在教學現場可採用中文版遠距聯想測驗評估學生創造力、營造安全的教學環境、重視學生自主發想、訊息整合與跳脫框架。本研究回顧21世紀至今中文版遠距聯想測驗應用於創造力研究之相關文獻，為中文版遠距聯想測驗的發展與應用提供一個綜觀性的框架，可做為後續研究檢驗創造力理論或現場教師評估學生創造力之參考。

關鍵字

中文 ； 創造力 ； 創造思考教學 ； 頓悟問題 ； 遠距聯想測驗

並列摘要

Creativity has been one of the focuses of educational research. The Remote Associates Test (RAT) is a valid measurement to evaluate the effect of creativity training. Because of its objective scoring, short completion time required, and relatively simple question preparation, RAT has been adopted in Chinese creativity research for almost 20 years. This study integrates the literature and is divided into four parts: development and comparison of different versions, the exploration of the problem-solving process, factors related to remote association, and effectiveness of different interventions. The results show that the Chinese version of RAT was developed in three levels: radical, character, and word. Behavioral and neuroscience research indicates that the problem-solving process must be dynamic and flexible, and that manipulating internal or external influences can improve associative ability. Suggestions for teaching practices include assessing students' creativity with the RAT, creating a safe environment, training divergent and convergent thinking, and thinking outside the box. The present study provides a comprehensive framework for the development and application of the Chinese versions of the RAT, methods to evaluate students' creativity, and proposes a scope for future research to examine creativity theory.

並列關鍵字

creativity ； creative thinking teaching ； insight problem ； mandarin ； Remote Associates Test

參考文獻

陳學志、彭淑玲、吳清麟（2011）。純頓悟與假頓悟中文遠距聯想測驗之創造力解題歷程。創造學刊，2（2），25-51。doi：10.30081/CESJ.201106.0002 [Chen, H. -C., Peng, S. -L., & Wu, Q. -L. (2011). The creative problem solving processes of pure and pseudo insight problems in Chinese remote association test. Journal of Chinese Creativity, 2(2), 25-51. doi: 10.30081/CESJ.201106.0002]

黃博聖、陳學志、劉政宏（2012）。「中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」之編製及其信、效度報告。測驗學刊，59（4），581-607。doi：10.7108/PT.201212.0581 [Huang, P. -S., Chen, H. -C., & Liu, C. -H. (2012). The development of Chinese word remote associates test for college students. Psychological Testing, 59(4), 581-607. doi: 10.7108/PT.201212.0581]

林緯倫、連韻文、任純慧（2005）。想得多是想得好的前提嗎？探討發散性思考能力在創意問題解決的角色。中華心理學刊，47（3），211-227。doi：10.6129/CJP.2005.4703.02 [Lin, W. -L., Lien, Y. -W., & Jen, C. -H. (2005). Is the more the better? The role of divergent thinking in creative problem solving. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 47(3), 211-227. doi: 10.6129/CJP.2005.4703.02]

洪榮昭、陳美蓮、葉建宏、陳柏熹（2020）。青少年創意自我效能、競賽投入與參加競賽的價值之關係－以 IEYI 世界青少年創客發明展選拔賽為例。教育心理學報，51（3），457-481。doi: 10.6251/BEP.202003_51(3).0006 [Hong, J. -C., Chen, M. -L., Ye, J. -H., & Chen, P. -H. (2020). The relationship between adolescents’ creative self-efficacy, competition engagements and the value of participating in competition-aking the IEYI international exhibition for young inventors as an example. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 51(3), 457-481. doi: 10.6251/BEP.202003_51(3).0006]

吳清麟、郭靜姿（2020）。數理資優能力、智力與大腦區域同質性之相關研究。教育心理學報，51（3），443-456。doi：10.6251/BEP.202003_51(3).0005 [Wu, C. -L., & Kuo, C. -C. (2020). Regional homogeneity correlates with mathematical and scientific talent and intelligence quotient. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 51(3), 443-456. doi: 10.6251/BEP.202003_51(3).0005]