國小自然科教師學習兩種探究式教學法與抉擇應用

The Primary Science Teachers Learn Two Kinds of Inquiry Teaching Methods and Choice Application

盧秀琴(Chow-Chin Lu) ； 劉靜文(Ching-Wen Liu)

《師資培育與教師專業發展期刊》 14卷1期 (2021/04) Pp. 1-27

https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492021041401001

摘要

因應12年國教強調探究與實作的改革，本研究以「昆蟲生理學特論」課程培育14位國小自然科教師兩種探究式教學法，探討其學習成效與抉擇應用的考量。本研究培育內容包含：講授昆蟲學理論、探究式教學法理論、示範教學，以及國小自然科教師抉擇一種教學法設計實驗教案與微型教學，並設計戶外教學學習單；本研究使用PO＋E微型教學評量或POEST微型教學評量予以評量，並訪談他們抉擇應用探究式教學法的想法。結果顯示：一、四組使用PO＋E教學法微型教學，三組使用POEST教學法微型教學，評量達到優良等級，表示能掌握探究式教學法的精髓。二、自然科教師學習探究式教學法後，所設計的教案能先鋪陳教學情境，使用簡報建構基本知識後再讓學生預測；其次、設計的實驗包含探究與實作，讓學生根據實驗紀錄去修正預測的錯誤理由。三、自然科教師抉擇PO＋E教學法是因為「科學解釋能力」六格容易撰寫，探討「科學原理」使得科學實驗更有意義。四、自然科教師抉擇POEST教學法是因為能引導學生使用2個實驗證據證明自己的主張，避免淪為主觀。

關鍵字

探究與實作 ； 探究式教學法 ； PO+E教學法 ； POEST教學法

並列摘要

In response to Taiwan's 12-year Basic Education plan, which emphasizes the reform of inquiry and implementation, this study used an ＂Advanced Entomology Physiology＂ course to train 14 primary science teachers to study two methods of inquiry teaching, where the teachers observed the learning effectiveness of the two methods, and selected the application they felt met their teaching needs. The nurturing contents included: teaching the theory of entomology and two inquiry-based teaching methods, as well as demonstration teaching, then the primary science teachers selected their preferred teaching method to design teaching and micro-teaching plans. This study used the Micro Teaching Assessment of PO+E (MTAP) and the Teaching Assessment of PO+E, as well as scientific explanations with text scaffolding (MTAPS), to evaluate the micro-teaching plans, and interviewed the participants regarding their thoughts. The results, are as follows. First, four groups selected the PO+E teaching method for micro-teaching, while three groups selected the POEST teaching method for micro-teaching. The assessment results achieved the excellent level, indicating that they could master the inquiry teaching methods. Second, after learning the two inquiry teaching methods, the primary science teachers first arranged their teaching situations and constructed lessons regarding the basic required knowledge, and then encouraged the students to predict the outcomes. The teachers found that they could design inquiry guidelines, as implement experiments, and remind students to correct the wrong reasons for their predictions, as based on the experimental records. Third, some primary science teachers selected the PO+E teaching method because the ＂science interpretation ability＂ made it easy to write lesson plans, and the exploration of ＂scientific theory＂ in class made the scientific experiments more meaningful. Fourth, primary science teachers selected the POEST teaching method because they could guide lines for students to apply 2 experimental evidence methods to prove their claims and avoid becoming subjective.

並列關鍵字

Inquiry-Based Teaching ； Inquiry and Implementation ； PO+E Teaching Method ； POEST Teaching Method

參考文獻

Boud, D., Dunn, J., & Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1988). Teaching in laboratories. Instructional Science, 17, 191-193. doi:10.1007/BF00052707

白佩宜、許瑛玿（2011）。探討不同探究式教學法對高一生科學探究能力與學習環境觀感之影響。課程與教學季刊，14(3)，123-156。[Pai, P. Y., & Hsu, Y. S. (2011). The impact of different inquiry-based instructions on tenth graders' inquiry ability and perspectives about learning environment. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 14(3), 123-156.]

邱美虹（2000）。概念改變研究的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊，8(1)，1-34。[Chiu, M. H. (2000). Reflections and implications of research on conceptual change. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 8(1), 1-34.]

邱彥文、黃世傑、王國華（2002）。國中理化課試行 POE 教學之個案研究。科學教育，12，53-69。[Chu, Y. W., Huang, S. C., & Wang, K. H. (2002). A case study of implementing a POE instruction by a chemistry teacher in junior high school. Science Education, 12, 53-69.]

林燕文、洪振方（2007）。對話論證的探究中學童論述策略對促進科學概念理解之研究。屏東教育大學學報，26，285-324。[Lin, Y. W., & Hung, J. F. (2007). A study of pupils' discourse strategies for promoting scientific conceptual understanding in argumentation-based inquiry. Journal of National Pingtung University Education, 26, 285-324.]