- 期刊
不同訓練環動作特性與運動強度之比較
Comparison of Movement Characteristics and Exercise Intensity between Different Training Hoops
摘要
目的：比較使用光速摩卡圈（MOKA, MK）與呼拉圈（Hula Hoop, HL）時的動作特性與運動強度差異。方法：18位健康女性（21.9 ± 1.8歲）隨機分別使用MK與HL三分鐘。使用Motion Analysis動作影像分析系統分析各項運動學參數。利用CARDIOsport GT5心率錶紀錄受試者運動時心跳率變化的情形。以相依樣本t檢定比較兩種訓練環在各依變項之間的差異。結果：使用HL時的髖關節活動角度範圍以及保留心跳率皆顯著大於MK（p ＜ .05），而動作頻率則無顯著差異。結論：相較於MK，使用HL時會有較大的髖關節活動範圍與運動強度，但對於動作頻率則無顯著差異。
並列摘要
Purpose: To compare the difference of movement characteristics and exercise intensity between MOKA (MK) and Hula Hoop (HL). Methods: Eighteen healthy females randomly used MOKA and Hula Hoop 3 minutes, respectively. Motion Analysis System was used to analyze all kinematic parameters. Cardiosport GT5 heart rate monitor was used to record heart rate during movements. The paired t-test was used to analyze the difference between MK and HL in dependent variables. Results: HL had significantly greater than MK in hip range of movement and heart rate reserved (p ＜ .05); Movement frequency was no significant difference between MK and HL. Conclusion: Use of HL has greater than MK in hip range of movement and exercise intensity, but movement frequency is no significant difference.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 吳一德、胡巧欣（1998）。不同運動項目健康體適能之比較分析。大專體育，(40)，79-86。https://doi.org/10.6162/SRR.1998.40.21
- 張木山、董俊男（2004）。不同動作頻率被動反覆衝擊式肌力訓練法訓練效果之比較研究。體育學報，(37)，289-301。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.0037.200409.2424
- 柯金城（2004）。不同運動項目選手運動覺之比較研究〔碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2004200712363846
- 劉孟竹、吳正杰、陳建廷（2018）。Effect of Different Training Program on Maximum Lower-limb Power and Agility in Basketball Players。臺灣體育學術研究，(64)，55-66。https://doi.org/10.6590/TJSSR.201806_(64).04
- 傅麗蘭（2000）。Effect of Individualized Exercise Training on Physical Fitness of Athletes。物理治療，25(5)，278-283。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=15632555-200009-25-5-278-283-a