透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.183.150
  • 期刊

對中輟高危險群學生進行團體工作模式之行動研究

Action Research on Group Work Model for Students at High-Risk of Dropout

摘要


本研究採行動研究法,探討團體工作模式介入中途輟學(以下簡稱中輟)高危險群學生之工作經驗及成效。研究對象以立意取樣,選取具相關背景之學生。透過對行動研究歷程之探索與分析,研究者提供更正向的思考、互動與因應策略,以協助學生們健康成長。本研究之分析架構有四,分別為「行動實踐的歷程探索與經驗統整」、「團體工作方案內容之檢討」、「團體成員參與團體互動之結果」、「研究者之困境、因應與學習」。依薩提爾模式為理論基礎進行團體工作(以下簡稱團體),研究結論如下:一、成員在團體中可經驗正向、健康的互動;二、團體能給予成員彼此間支持與陪伴;三、團體工作者即為工具,具催化成員改變之效能;四、團體工作者營造安全及可信任之環境,供成員呈現改變;五、薩提爾模式有助於團體建立正向互動情境;六、薩提爾模式使團體領導者以人性觀點看待成員;七、薩提爾模式提供領導者探索成員內在的方法;八、薩提爾模式提供領導者自我省思與學習的管道;九、助人者需具備知行合一的能力。上述結論提供學校與實務工作者於不同角度檢視中輟高危險群學生議題。最後,依據本研究之結果對學校、實務工作者及未來研究提出相關建議以作為參考。

並列摘要


This action research discusses the experience and effectiveness of group work model intervention in students at high-risk of dropout. The research subjects were selected by purposive sampling, and we invited students who are at high-risk of dropout. Through the exploration and analysis of this action research process, we hope to provide schools and practitioners with more positive thinking and interaction to help students grow up healthily. There are four framework analyses, including "the course of practical action to explore and the integration of experience," "review of the group work plan," "the results of groups members participating in the interaction of groups," as well as "researcher's plight, coping, and learning." The researchers offered the following conclusions: A. group members have a positive experience and healthy interaction; B. groups can give members support and companionship; C. a group worker, who acts as a tool, can help members change; D. group workers create a safe and trusted environment, which will encourage the members to show their change; E. the Satir model helps groups build positive interaction contexts; F. the Satir model helps the group leader to treat members from a humanity perspective; G. the Satir model gives leaders a method to explore the member's inner world; H. the Satir model paves a way for leaders to grow self-reflection and learning pipeline; I. social workers need to integrate theory with their ability to perceive members' inner world. These conclusions provide schools and practitioners with different angles so that they can cope with students at high-risk of dropout. Finally, according to the results of this study, the research proposes several suggestions for school, social work professionals, and future research.

參考文獻


卓紋君、黃創華(2003)。薩提爾模式家庭探源團體療效研究—參與者觀點的分析。中華心理衛生學刊,16(3),31-59。doi:10.30074/FJMH.200309_16(3). 0002。
林杏足、陳佩鈺、陳美儒(2006)。國中高危險群學生對其危險因子與保護因子的知覺之分析研究。教育心理學報,38(2),151-176。doi:10.6251/BEP.20060815。
Ellis, A. (1992). Group rational-emotive and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Interna-tional Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 42(1), 63-80. doi:10.1080/00207284.1992.11732580。
王秀絨(2012)。團體工作運用藝術之理念及策略。社區發展季刊,140,41-52。
方隆彰(2001)。社會團體工作。載於萬育維(編著),社會工作概論:理論與實務(頁73-96)。臺北市:雙葉書廊。

延伸閱讀