Sensation as Participation in Visual Art

Clive Cazeaux

《Aesthetic Pathways》 2卷2期 (2012/06) Pp. 2-30

https://doi.org/10.29431/AP.201206.0001

並列摘要

Can an understanding be formed of how sensory experience might be presented or manipulated in visual art in order to promote a relational concept of the senses? This would be in opposition to the customary, capitalist notion of sensation as a private possession, as a sensory impression that is mine. I ask the question in the light of recent visual art theory and practice which pursue relational, ecological ambitions. As Arnold Berleant, Nicolas Bourriaud, and Grant Kester see it, ecological ambition and artistic form should correspond, but they fail to recognize sensation as a site where the ecological cause can be fought. Jacques Rancière argues for the political force of the senses, but his distribution of the sensible does not address the particularity of sensory experience. I identify the difference between these approaches within recent relational or ecological aesthetics and my position on sensibility, and indicate some of the problems involved in referring to the senses. I set out the concepts that are central to the cultivation of relational sensibility: style, autofiguration, and the mobility of sensory meaning, extrapolated from Maurice Merleau-Ponty's discussion of Paul Cézanne. They amount to positioning the senses ontologically as movements along lines of conceptual-sensory connection and implication, based on the transfer of meanings created artistically through style and autofiguration.

並列關鍵字

autofiguration ； Cézanne ； conceptual-sensory ； ecology ； ontology ； style