透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.146.105.194
  • 期刊

2011亞洲女子排球錦標賽比賽技術運用現況及表現得分之分析研究-以中華隊對戰泰國隊為例

摘要


本研究以2011年第16屆亞洲女子排球錦標賽8強交叉決賽中華隊與泰國隊為研究對象。以影帶觀察法,將中華隊及泰國隊對戰比賽過程之發球、接發球、扣球攻擊、攔網、防守等五項排球比賽技術做詳細的觀察、評分及記錄。再將各項比賽技術表現予以登錄,隨後輸入電腦進行統計分析。先將觀察所得資料以描述性統計法做分析比較,然後透過獨立樣本t檢定,檢定各項資料之差異性。經逐一將研究結果進行分析與討論,本研究獲得以下結論:1.以選手之基本條件比較,中華隊平均年齡較泰國隊年輕,平均攔網高度優於泰國隊,而身高、體重及攻擊點平均高度兩隊在伯仲之間。2.在發球方面:研究結果發現,中華隊在發球動作與發球位置上和泰國隊達顯著差異(P<.05)。主要原因在於中華隊發球動作變化及發球位置移動較泰國隊少。在發球表現得分方面兩隊並未達顯著差異,但中華隊第一局8次發球失誤高於泰國隊4次。3.在接發球方面兩隊並未達顯著差異。4.在扣球攻擊球方面:兩隊在扣球攻擊技、戰術及表現得分方面兩隊並未達顯著差異。5.在攔網表現得分方面,兩隊並未達顯著差異。6.在防守方面:兩隊第三局在防守位置上達顯著差異(P<.05)。但防守表現得分方面兩隊並未達顯著差異,顯示兩隊之防守能力及技術不相上下。

並列摘要


This study investigated the game of Chinese Taipei against Thailand in the semi-finals of the top eight teams(cross-over method adopted) in 2011Asian Women's Volleyball Championship. Through watching the videotape of the game between Chinese Taipei and Thailand, the researchers carefully observed and recorded the data of five game skills-serving balls, receiving balls, spiking, blocking, and defence. Then, all the performance data of five skills were constructed by the computer for further analysis. The data, after the process of evaluation, categorization, and arrangement, were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics and independent-sample T test to verify whether there were any significant differences among them. After having gone through the discussion of the findings, some conclusions could be obtained. First of all, if some basic qualifications were compared, the players of Chinese Taipei were better than those of Thailand in terms of age and average height of blocking while both teams were even in the matter of height, weight, average height of attack point. Secondly, one finding showed that there were significant differences(P<.05)in the part of serving balls of Chinese Taipei if compared with Thailand. The major reason was that there was less technique variation for Chinese Taipei than for Thailand in terms of service motions and movements of serving place. However, there was no significant difference between both teams in regard to getting scores by virtue of service. In the first set, Chinese Taipei got eight service faults while Thailand got only four. Thirdly, both teams did not reach any significant differences in serving and receiving balls. Fourthly, there were no differences for both teams with respect to spiking, attacking strategies, and scoring performance. Fifthly, both teams were even in getting scores by the action of blocking. Finally, so far as defence was concerned, both teams in the third set reached significant differences(P<.05)in the defence position but not in scoring performance. This indicated that both teams were even in terms of defence ability and skills.

延伸閱讀