Background: We aimed to assess the diagnostic utility and performance of C-11 Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) positron emission tomography (PET), which detects brain amyloid deposition, for the diagnosis of underlying cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Methods: Seventy-seven spontaneous ICH patients were recruited in our study. CAA was diagnosed by the Boston criteria. All patients (11 CAA, 66 non-CAA) underwent PiB PET to evaluate brain amyloid retention. The amyloid burden was visually assessed and dichotomized as PiB (+) and PiB (-). The global standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was also calculated using the cerebellum as reference. Results: Based on visual classification, 10/11 CAA patients were PiB (+) as compared with 10/66 non-CAA patients (sensitivity = 90.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 58.7- 99.8; specificity = 84.9%, 95% CI = 73.9-92.5). Quantitative assessment using global SUVR > 1.23 as the cutoff value yielded similar findings (sensitivity = 90.9%, 95% CI = 58.7-99.8; specificity = 89.4%, 95% CI = 79.4-95.6). There was no difference in the diagnostic performance between visual ratings and quantitative assessment (p = 0.51). Combining binary visual ratings and SUVR increased the specificity to 94.0% (95% CI = 85.2-98.3), without affecting sensitivity. Conclusions: C-11 PiB PET can be used as a diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity for CAA in patients with spontaneous ICH. Visual ratings had a similar diagnostic efficacy as the quantitative method, and could be readily applied in clinical and research settings.
背景:本研究目的為評估C-11 Pittsburgh compound B(PiB)腦部正子造影於類澱粉血管病變(cerebral amyloid angiopathy, CAA)之診斷效力。方法:本研究納入77位自發性腦出血患者(11位CAA,66位非CAA)。所有病人皆接受了PiB腦部正子造影。經由視覺判讀,將其腦部類澱粉之沉積狀況分為PiB(+)或PiB(-);除此之外,經過小腦校正之後,計算每位病人之標準PiB攝取值(standardized uptake value ratio, SUVR)作為定量分析使用。結果:根據視覺判讀之結果,11位CAA病人中有10位為PiB(+),而66位非CAA病人中,有10位為PiB(+)(敏感度=90.9%,95%信賴區間=58.7~99.8;特異度=84.9%,95%信賴區間=73.9~92.5)。定量分析中,若將SUVR值>1.23當作臨界值以區分正子造影之結果,會得到類似的結果(敏感度=90.9%,95%信賴區間=58.7~99.8;特異度=89.4%,95%信賴區間=79.4~95.6)。視覺判讀與定量分析的診斷效力並無顯著差異(p=0.51)。結合視覺判讀及定量分析能增加特異度至94.0%(95%信賴區間=85.2~98.3)且不影響敏感度。結論:對於類澱粉血管病變腦出血,PiB正子造影為一高敏感度與高特異度之診斷工具。視覺判讀與定量分析具有類似的診斷與區分能力,應可以作為未來臨床及研究使用時,分析方式之選擇。