- 期刊
- OpenAccess
跆拳道品勢比賽技術分析－以103大專運動會個人男子組金牌選手為例
Taekwondo Poomsae Technical Analysis: A Case Study of Individual Male Gold Medal in 2014 National Intercollegiate Athletic Games
摘要
本研究旨探討在103 年全國大專校院運動會跆拳道品勢競賽個人男子組冠軍選手之技術與表現之分析，以訪談法從裁判觀點來了解該選手比賽技術與表現的優點與缺點及其獲勝因素與裁判評分之重點，提供未來訓練與競賽方向之參考。研究結果：一、個案選手在技術上，步伐清楚且穩定，動作完整合於標準，表現方面，速度與力量表現足夠，整體穩定性佳，自信佳，細節處理在整體呈現上都優於其他選手。二、個案選手獲勝因素為技術標準合於規範、整體速度力量以及停頓點清楚乾淨，步伐穩定乾淨俐落、自信心佳，氣勢優於其他選手。三、裁判評分以步伐為優先考量，其次為手部動作，最後為踢擊動作，表現部分速度力量為最主要評分項目，其次為穩定性、節奏性與整體精神給予評分。
並列摘要
This study was to investigate techniques of the champion athlete in 2014 National Intercollegiate Athletic Games of Man Taekwondo Poomsae. Participants were referees and interview methods was used to understand his techniques’ advantages/disadvantages and the rational of referees’ perspectives in competition. The results revealed his advantages in techniques were accurate in footsteps and movement. His performance was good in speed, power, and stable. In general, his whole image was self-confidence and that’s the reason why he was better than the other competitors. The first priority in referees’ rational in technique score was footsteps, the second was hand, and the third was kick. In performance score, speed and accurate were the main concerns for referees, then stable, rhythm, and spirits.
延伸閱讀
- 李建忠、蔡明志、林冠宇（2020）。跆拳道比賽技術分析─以108年全國大專校院運動會公開男子組金牌選手為例。輔仁大學體育學刊，(19)，87-113。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=16841018-202007-202109130010-202109130010-87-113
- 李映萱、李珍鎬、陳莖斐、詹貴惠（2020）。108年全國中等學校運動會跆拳道品勢高中男女個人組決賽之太白及金剛型成績分析。臺灣體育學術研究，(69)，57-67。https://doi.org/10.6590/TJSSR.202012_(69).04
- 邱共鉦、林冠宇、黃信捷、陳淑貞（2021）。全國大專運動會跆拳道公開男子組選手競賽技術分析探討。跆拳道學刊，(8)，57-74。https://doi.org/10.3966/251969952021120008005
- 黃慶豐、戴郁倫、陳香吟、劉宇（2006）。2004雅典奧運男子組第一量級跆拳道之技戰術分析。文化體育學刊，()，117-122。https://doi.org/10.6634/JPSS-CCU.200606.04.12
- 周桂名、邱盟仁（2009）。Research of Taekwondo Attack Score Actions and Areas: 2008 National Presidential Taekwondo Championship Final Games of Female Division。運動教練科學，(15)，11-22。https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.2009.15.02