This paper analyzes how liability rule influences the expert’s behavior in credence goods market. The expert, who diagnoses the consumer’s need and then provides the treatment to the consumer, may defraud the consumer in the form of overtreatment. Our results find that the price of the same treatment is higher under strict liability than under negligence liability. The overtreatment behavior is more prevailing under strict liability. Moreover, we show that from the perspective of social welfare, negligence liability rule is weakly better than strict liability rule. However, strict liability rule can sometimes be better than negligence liability rule from the perspective of consumer surplus. We further analyzes how the existence of connoisseur consumer affects the expert’s propensity to engage in overtreatment and how different market structures impact the credence goods market.