適用於人文社會學者之非傳統學術指標研究

Exploring alternative metrics for scholarly performance in social science and humanities in Taiwan

王鈞湄(Chun-Mei Wang)

指導教授 ： 唐牧群

國立臺灣大學/文學院/圖書資訊學研究所/碩士(2013年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.00778

摘要

傳統上欲呈現一位學者之學術表現時，多由其各類型著作之數量及著作被引用之數量著手，以這些指標進行學術表現呈現，其中又以學術期刊論文之著作數與被引數為主要利用之數據。對於人文及社會兩個學科的學者而言，在其學術性著作中圖書相當重要，在非學術性之一般性報章雜誌中亦有文章出版，近年來網際網路中之學術活動亦蓬勃發展—然而，上述非傳統之資源在傳統的學術表現呈現方法中皆未包含，也使得人文社會學者的學術表現呈現，在現行之方法下並不完整。本研究以臺灣大學人文社會高等院之計畫參與學者為研究對象，旨在探討由人文社會學者之學科特色觀察，有哪些可用於呈現學術表現之非傳統指標，並配合傳統之著作與引文指標，以及得獎和計畫數兩項學術成就指標進行分析。結果顯示，非傳統指標有做為學術表現指標之潛力，且其所呈現之學術表現面向與傳統指標不完全相同，且對學術表現指標有一定影響力，可補足傳統指標未能包含之學術表現。此外，人文及社會學者兩學科間之分析結果亦存在顯著差異，因此於選用呈現學術表現之指標時，亦應考量各學科特色進行調整。同時選用傳統及非傳統指標，加以不同學科之學科特色考量，方能完整呈現一位人文社會學者之學術表現。

關鍵字

學術評量 ； 學術傳播 ； 科學計量學

並列摘要

While presenting the scholarly performance, traditionally the number of publications and their citation counts are used as indicators, and journal-related indicators have long been de facto measures of performance. However, in social science and humanities, publications besides journal, for example books and articles in press and non-scholarly periodicals, are also important. The Web has also been a place where influences of scholarly activities manifest themselves. None of these aforementioned publication or resources is included in traditional scholarly performace indicators. This research aimed to explore non-traditional performance indicators that take into account the characteristics of social science and humanities in order to better reflect the scholarly performance. Data of scholars from the Institute for Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences in National Taiwan University were collected for analysis. Traditional and non-traditional performance inicators were collected and tested against two scholarly standing indicators. The results are that non-traditional indicators collected are able to reflect the scholarly performance, and the facets they reflected are different from traditional indicators. The results suggest the need to include non-traditional indicators to better reflect the scholar performance of social science and humanities. Furthermore, noticeable diffrerences were also found between social science and humanities. The analysis indicated that the inclusion of both traditional and non-traditional indicators will make the measure more comprehensive for social science and humanitie scholars.

並列關鍵字

scholarly evaluation ； scholarly communication ； scientometrics

參考文獻

吳紹群（民99年）。臺灣地區人文學學術出版與學術傳播之研究。未出版之博士論文，國立臺灣大學圖書與資訊學研究所。

曾元顯（民99年）。世界大學網路排名－分析與應用。評鑑雙月刊，25，42-46。

張慧銖（民96年）。積極建立人文學門教師研究力評鑑指標。評鑑雙月刊，5，42-43。

吳紹群、陳雪華（民100年）。人文學專書出版問題對學術傳播之影響。大學圖書館，15(2)，39-61。

黃慕萱、張郁蔚（民94年）。從研究產出探討人文社會學者學術評鑑之特性。圖書資訊學刊，2(3/4)，1-19。