FPF(First Person Film)所指的是第一視角拍攝的影片,研究者以自身施做意像訓練的經驗為靈感,以第一視角影片做為意象訓練的訓練教材,並測試它與身體練習在接力理解性動作的訓練結果差異,並亦測試了在身體練習過程加入FPF意象訓練(綜合練習)的差異。 本研究的目的是以FPF作為意像訓練的媒介,藉此幫助學生進行意象訓練,觀察它是否能夠作為有效提高國小學童在接力比賽時的理解性動作表現的替代方案。 研究者在探討了國小生至高中生的意象訓練施作過程與結果、第一視角輔助學習的重要性、意象訓練的施作方法、第一視角影像的拍攝方法及國小生接棒動作要領後,著手設計FPF意象訓練教材。 研究者以新北市某國小,常態編班的五年級數個班級進行抽樣,各班男女各取9人(共27人),並將受測者分為僅做FPF意象訓練的「意象訓練組」、僅做身體動作練習的「身體練習組」,以及綜合上述兩者訓練項目的「綜合練習組」。 研究者首先測驗各組在接力理解性動作先備經驗上的表現,確認各組之先備經驗無顯著差異後,開始分別施做了三週的訓練,並實施後測比較成果,接著間隔一週後進行保留測驗,以檢視不同訓練法的成效。 結果表顯示,在上述的後測測驗中,意象訓練組、身體練習組與綜合練習組皆呈現了顯著性的進步,相隔了一週所施作的保留測驗亦維持著進步的成效。
FPF (First Person Film) refers to a film shotted by the first-person viewing angle. Exerting the researcher’s own image training experiences, and utilizing the first viewing angle films as the image training materials, results of the image training and those of the body training in the relay intelligibility movements can be compared in regard of their differences. Moreover, the differences after adding FPF image training into the body practice process were also tested. This research aims at using FPF as the training media, with which we can help students to receive image training. On the other hand, we can therefore observe whether image training can function as the alternative program to effectively promote elementary school students’ intelligible movement performance in the relay contest. The researcher has designed FPF image training materials after exploring the process and results of implementing image training, the importance of the first viewing angle in assisting learning, the implementation methods for the image training, the way to shot a film through the first viewing angle image, and having an idea of the tips for the elementary school students’ relay movement. The researcher conducted sampling from several general 5th grade classes in a specific school in New Taipei City, picking 9 males and 9 females in each class (totally 27 persons). Then, the testees were classified into the “Image Training Group” that only did FPF image training, the “Body Practice Group” that only did body movement, and the “Comprehensive Practice Group” that did the abovementioned two trainings. In the beginning, the researcher tested each group’s performance in the prior experiences of the relay intelligible movement. After confirming there was no significant difference among the groups’ prior experiences, three-week training started for the three groups, respectively; while post-test was conducted to compare the results. Then, one week later, retention test was proceeded to review the effect of different training methods. According to the results, in the post-test mentioned above, all the Image Training Group, the Body Training Group, and the Comprehensive Group make significant progress. In the same way, the results of the retention test done one week later also show continued progressive effect