階層分析法（AHP）在臺北市國民中學優質教育指標系統之應用研究

A Research on Quality Education Indicators of Junior High School Performance in Taipei City

林美娟(May-Jen Lin)

指導教授 ： 吳政達

淡江大學/教育學院/教育政策與領導研究所碩士班/碩士(2005年)

https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2005.00049

摘要

本研究旨在透過國內外相關文件之分析，參酌各主要國家建立中等學校表現指標的經驗，利用階層分析法並考量臺北市教育制度的現況與特性，提出合理正確的臺北市國民中學學校優質指標，供臺北市國民中學校務評鑑重要資訊提供，供決策者進行整體教育決策之參考。
另外，針對臺北市國民中學學校優質指標系統之應用，提出研究結果與討論，依次進行國民中學教育目標與內涵分析、優質指標概念之分析、校長與教師意見之分析等，連結優質教育指標之共構與應用，以統整臺北市國中優質評鑑指標系統。

一、結論：
1. 用階層分析法幫助我們明瞭，目前校長與教師對教育政重
視之優先順序。
2. 反應臺北市國民中學九年一貫實施情況。
3. 回饋各校對教育指標等政策執行之成效。
二、建議：
1. 教育行政機關應將優質教育指標發展納入長期計畫，積極推
動優質教育指標政策之應用，並發展「教師有效教學」綜合性指
標為首要。
2. 將國民中學學校優質指標列入學校本位校務發展計畫，運用
指標提升有效教學、檢視九年一貫學力表現之進展，協助學校朝
向優質教育發展。
3. 實成立專責單位並編列預算支援優質教育指標之研究。

關鍵字

階層分析法 ； 優質教育指標 ； 校務評鑑

並列摘要

The goals of this study are to utilize Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), consider the present situation and character of educational system at Taipei City and offer the reasonable and correct “Quality school indicators” of junior high schools at Taipei City through literature analysis and referring to the experiences how they set up performance indicators of middle school in other countries.
The results of research are for school evaluation at Taipei City and policymakers as reference.
In addition, this study proposes the research results and discussions for application of excellent school indicators system of junior high schools at Taipei City. This study analyzes educational goals and connotations of junior high schools, the conception of excellent indicators, and the opinions of principals and teachers etc in order. This study integrates every educational indicators and application with excellent evaluation indicators system of junior high schools at Taipei City.

Conclusion:
1.The study adopted Analytic Hierarchy Process to
realizedthose principals and teachers the priority
ranking for educational policy for the current.
2.To reflected the implementation of Nine-year
Integrated Curriculum in Taipei Junior high school.
3.The feedback implementation of educational policy in
Taipei Junior high school.

Suggestion:
1.Application of research results：is for educational
administrative authorities. They should make long term
plans of school development according to each
indicator,and engaged in promoting teachers’teaching
at first.
2.Each school should regard “quality school
educational indicators” as school basic development
program.They should use the indicators of
administrators,students and parents and stride forward
the goal of excellent school
3.Practical application： further should establish the
professional of organization educational indictors
system,and compare with excellent educational indictors
system and budget of this study.

並列關鍵字

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) ； quality education indicators ； school evaluation

參考文獻

謝金青（1998）。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構。新

行政院主計處（2001）。臺北市評比指標概況分析。臺北：作者。

陳添財（2002）。綜合高中學校效能評鑑指標建構之研究。臺北科技

張慈娟（1997）。國民小學校長教學領導與學校效能之研究。新竹師

潘俊程（2003）。台中縣國民小學校務評鑑之研究。台中師範學院國