臺灣人文社會學科期刊開放取用模式探討

A Study of Open Access in Taiwan Humanities and Social Science Journals

洪詩淳(Shih-Chun Hung)

指導教授 ： 邱炯友

淡江大學/文學院/資訊與圖書館學系碩士班/碩士(2013年)

https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2013.00530

摘要

本研究透過訪談法，對臺灣人文社會學科期刊進行探討，藉以瞭解目前臺灣人文社會學科期刊開放取用之情形，以及瞭解期刊編輯對於OA與Hybrid OA之看法，期望研究結果，能作為未來臺灣人文社會學科學術期刊推行OA之參考。歸納本研究之研究結果如下：
一、期刊編輯樂見於OA之發展
二、OA尚未普及仍有待推廣
三、Hybrid OA於臺灣發展尚存疑慮
四、開放單篇文章費用應由作者、作者所屬母機構與期刊出版單位共同負擔
本研究依據研究結果分別對Hybrid OA、臺灣人文社會學科、政府及相關單位與開放單篇文章費用之負擔比例提出相關建議。

關鍵字

開放取用 ； 複合式開放取用 ； 期刊編輯 ； 人文社會學科

並列摘要

Through the in-depth interview, this research conducts a study on Taiwan humanities and social science journals. This research is aimed at exploring the practice of open access in Taiwan humanities and social science journals, as well as looking into the viewpoint and attitude of Journal editors about open access and hybrid open access.
The findings can be used as references by Taiwan humanities and social science journals and make use of such results in open access in the future. The findings are as follows:
1.Journal editors are optimistic to the development of open access.
2.Open access is not prevailing in Taiwan humanities and social science journals and still needs to be promoted.
3.There are some doubts in the development of hybrid open access in Taiwan.
4.The fees for the article should be charged on author, the organization which the author belongs to and journals publishers.
Based on the above findings, several suggestions are provided to hybrid open access, Taiwan humanities and social science journals, government organizations and the fees that should be charged for the article.

並列關鍵字

Open Access ； Hybrid Open Access ； Journal Editors ； Humanities and Social Science

參考文獻

邱炯友、謝佳芸、蔡孟倫、莊正德。華文學術資源開放存取(Open Access)期刊出版之營運模式與策略 (國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC 95-2413-H-032-006)。(臺北市：淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系，2007)。

傅雅秀。「資訊免費使用之芻議: 以生命科學資訊為例」。圖書資訊學刊16期 (2011)。http://jlis.lis.ntu.edu.tw/article/o16-7.pdf。

邱炯友。「編者言：Open Access Hybrid期刊的另類策略」。教育資料與圖書館學 44卷，1期 (2006)：1-2。

Bjork, Bo-Christer. “The Hybrid Model for Open Access Publication of Scholarly Articles: A Failed Experiment?” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, no. 8 (2012): 1496-1504.

Budapest Open Access Initiative. “Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative.” http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read (accessed November 17, 2011).