透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.17.150.163
  • 學位論文

差異化策略、預算重視程度、預算規劃模式與績效關聯性之研究

The relationships among differentiation strategy, budget emphasis, budget planning model, and performance

指導教授 : 黃振豊 孔繁華

摘要


本研究主要探討差異化策略、預算重視程度、預算規劃模式與績效間的關聯性。預算重視對組織的影響,一直是重要的研究課題。然而,影響預算重視的成因,卻是甚少探討的。故,本研究使用結構方程模式檢視策略對預算重視程度、預算規劃模式與績效的直接影響,並討論預算規劃模式的中介效果。研究結果發現,策策略對預算重視程度、預算規劃模式與績效存在顯著正向影響,預算規劃模式是策略與績效的顯著中介因子。預算規劃模式對於績效是正向相關,此外預算重視程度與預算規劃模式亦是正相關。

並列摘要


The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationships among differentiation strategy, budget emphasis, budget planning model, and performance. The effect of budget emphasis on organization has been concerned for several decades. However, the antecedent factor of budget emphasis is rarely discussed. For this reason, study uses structural equation modeling to investigate the direct effect of strategy on budget emphasis, budget planning model and performance, also discuss the meditative effect of budget planning. The result show that strategy has positive effect on budget emphasis, budget planning model and performance; budget planning is a significant mediator of the relationship between strategy and performance. The effect of budget planning on performance is significantly positive, and budget emphasis is associated with budget planning.

參考文獻


周齊武、杜榮瑞、陳慧玲,2005,環境不確定性、預算制度特徵與公司績效,管理學報,第22卷第4期,頁549-567。
Kim, H., J. Kim, Y. Lee, and I. Lee. 2003. Post-adoption behavior of mobile internet users: An empirical validation with a structural equation model. Working Paper, Available: http://hci.yonsei.ac.kr/publications.htm. Feb.15, 2003.
Merchant, K. A., and W. A. Van der Stede. 2007. Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (2 ed.). Harlow, England: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Bagozzi, R., and Y. Yi. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1): 74-94.
Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Penality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173-1182.

延伸閱讀