透過您的圖書館登入
IP:54.163.62.42
  • 學位論文

「窩」在那兒?淡水地區大專院校女同志生活風格之自我展演

The life styles of university lesbians among different accommodation choices in Tamshui area

指導教授 : 鄧建邦

摘要


本研究探討的問題是住宿空間相異的大學女同志,她們將如何成就其生活風格的展演,離家的女同志有了與原生家庭的空間區隔,使得她們獲得更多伸展的舞台空間?還是,雖然離開了原生家庭,得到更大自由度的只有外賃居所的女同志,而住宿於學校宿舍的女同志卻受到了更多的監視?她們各自又會如何運用何種策略來達成其自我展演?而住宿空間的差異對出櫃與否的女同志的影響又有怎樣的差別?而同樣身為女同志,不同的T、婆與不分之屬性,是否在其認同、出櫃與生活態度的策略選擇上亦會分殊? 研究者以深入訪談與參與觀察的方式,訪問八位大學女同志受訪者,有以下的研究發現: 一. 不同的現身態度會影響女同志住所的選擇,現身態度可區分為: 1. 完全隱身 2. 部分現身/隱身 3. 完全現身 4. 曖昧不明 二. 在不同的空間場域中女同志會有差別的現身的態度。 三. 大學女同志所擁有的各式資本越多使得其生活風格的展演上會有更多的舞台。 四. 女同志在不同的窩中會有差異的生活風格,可以歸納出三種類型: 1. 居住在原生家庭的窩---複雜簡單型 2. 居住在校舍的窩---移居過客型 3. 居住在外宿的窩---開放保護型 五. 女同志不一定會喜歡與圈內人居住在同一空間中,因為這樣會更顯封閉性,與異性戀比鄰反而能擁有個體獨立性。

並列摘要


This research addresses the issue of how different spaces of accommodation influence the life style of university lesbians. Will lesbians who live separate from their family get more freedom than those who live together with their family? Are lesbians who live in university dormitory still under constant surveillance although they live separate from their family? Data consists of personal observations and in-depth interviews with eight university lesbians. The findings of this research are: Firstly, different attitudes toward “come out” will influence the university lesbians to choose the place of their residence. These attitudes can be divided into four types: 1. Totally hide, 2. Partly come out and partly hide, 3. Totally come out, and 4. Ambiguous and unidentified. Secondly, the university lesbians in this research have different attitudes toward “come out” in different places. Thirdly, the university lesbians usually have different self-performing strategies and know how to use them because of their various cultural capitals. Fourthly, the university lesbians have different life styles in different places of residence. In this research three types of life styles can be identified: 1. Living in original family -- Simple living type 2. Living in university dormitory -- “ Living in temporality” type 3. Living in privately rented student dwellings – “Open to everyone” type Finally, university lesbians are willing to live together with heterosexuals in comparison with lesbians because the formers will let them feel more independent.

並列關鍵字

lesbian capital accommodation space come out life style

參考文獻


張娟芬。(2001)愛的自由式。台北市:時報文化。
趙彥寧。(2000)台灣同志研究的回顧與展望—一個關於文化生產的分析。台灣社會研究季刊,38:207-244。
袁筱嫒。(2004)學生宿舍中之領域性與私密性相關行為研究-以中原大學良善宿舍為例。國立中原大學室內設計學系碩士論文。
高穎超、許雯娟、楊斐如、劉倩華。(2005)性、性欲特質與同志空間。台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所性別與環境期末報告。
Bulter, Judith(1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

被引用紀錄


張晉文(2008)。分工與共治:男同志家庭的家務分工與家務創造〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0016-2002201314483231

延伸閱讀