政府與媒體對能源政策的風險建構與溝通－新深澳電廠案的框架分析

本研究從風險傳播的觀點，以2018年的「新深澳電廠案」為例，探討政府與平面媒體如何建構與溝通能源政策之風險，其中包括政府與報紙各自關注的新聞主題、新聞或報導立場、強調的風險框架及其異同。本研究採用框架分析結合內容分析法，分析政府相關部門新聞稿與《自由時報》、《聯合報》、《蘋果日報》等三大報相關報導。研究發現，新深澳案中，政府與媒體兩方對於新深澳案的風險有不同的關注，政府最強調科技風險框架，媒體最重視健康與政治風險框架。此外，新深澳案期間正逢直轄市長及縣市長選舉於2018年11月24日舉行，報紙媒體主題大量聚焦選舉話題，顯現台灣能源政策從核能議題以來，仍然缺乏理性專業對話，本文同時就遭受深度政治化現象的影響進行討論。

關鍵字

風險社會；風險傳播；能源政策；新深澳電廠案

並列摘要

By researching the relationship of different stakeholders in risk communication, this research takes the “New Shenao Power Plant” event in 2018 as an example to delve into how the government agencies and media construct and communicate the risks of energy policy. The research data were collected from the press releases of the government agencies. More specifically, this research used major 3 daily newspapers: Liberty Times, United Daily News, and Apple Daily. Results show that the government agencies emphasize on technology risks, print media concerns most about public health and political risks. Further more, because the Nine-in-One Elections was held on November 24, 2018, print media covered mostly the elections and did not sufficiently present to the general public the risks of “New Shenao Power Plant” event, as the texts were compared with the government press releases. Results are discussed in terms of implications with the increased politicization of energy issues in Taiwan.