透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.21.97.61
  • 學位論文

公共工程總價承攬契約履約爭議問題之研究

The Study of Construction Disputes of Lump-sum Contract in Construction

指導教授 : 林正平 林祐正

摘要


公共工程具有契約金額龐大與涉及廣泛之特性,衍生之爭議類型多樣且複雜,而爭端之解決是否適當、迅速、合理、公平,均影響參與廠商之權益與採購機關任務延宕之公益損失,衍生之政府公信折損與社會成本虛耗損失更是鉅大深遠。現今,工程爭議處理已成為營建管理上相當重要之一環,而總價承攬契約所衍生之爭議又為公共工程履約爭議之最主要來源,實有必要加以探討。本研究藉由文獻整理歸納與案例研究方法,蒐集我國各級法院、公共工程調解委員會、仲裁判斷對於總價承攬契約履約爭議之裁判論據或調解建議,用以瞭解總價承攬契約衍生爭議之爭點所在及對於相關爭議處理見解為何,並就其裁判論據揭示之依據或結論與現行之相關法規、學說研究、實務處理相互對照,探討工程爭議之緣由進而分析爭議之本質與問題,歸納出依循之準據,並就易生爭議之爭點問題,建議訂定明確之處理規範或處置方式,甚至於疏漏之處予以檢討修正,將爭點從源頭消弭於無形,建立公平、合理、妥適之契約條件供契約雙方遵循,保障雙方當事人間之權益,減少總價承攬契約衍生之履約紛爭,避免爭訟所生人力、物力、時間、成本等之耗損。

並列摘要


Public Works has a substantial amount of contract cover a wide range of features derived from diverse dispute types and complexity of the adequacy of the settlement of the dispute, quickly, reasonable, fair, and affect the interest of the participating manufacturers and the public welfare loss of purchasing authority the task delays, derived from government impairment of public confidence in the wasted loss and social cost is enormous and far-reaching, modern engineering and dispute handling has become one of the very important ring in the construction management, lump-sum contract derivative contract dispute but also the most important source of public construction contract, there is need to be explored in this study includes finishing the induction and case study methods to collect our courts at all levels, Public Works mediation Committee, the arbitration judge referee arguments for lump-sum contract of the contract in dispute or the mediation proposals to understand the total contract derivative where the controversial point of contention and related controversial insights into why, and on the basis or conclusions of the referee arguments revealed the existing relevant laws and regulations to study the theory, practice handling cross-referencing to investigate construction disputes previously analyzed the nature of the controversy and problems, summarized the follow the quasi-According to, and prone to dispute the contention point, the recommendations set given clear handling specifications, or disposal of the way, even sparse leakage of in to review the amendment, will be point of contention from the source to eliminate the invisible, to establish a fair,reasonable and appropriate the lease conditions for the contract to follow the two sides, to protect the rights and interests between the parties, reduce the lump-sum contract derivative contract performance disputes, to avoid contentious human and material resources, time, cost, such as wear and tear.

參考文獻


[29]、詹森林,「公共工程定型化工期展延條款之實務問題」,法令月刊第61卷第8期,2008 年8月。
[17]、行政院公共工程委員會委託研究計畫,「政府採購爭議處理事件案源及問題類型分析成果報告」,2004年9月。
[27]、李明璋,「因工期展延所生施工管理費之計算模型」之研究,國立中央大學營建管理研究所碩士論文,2008年。
[28]、吳若萍,「公共營建工程契約中遲延完工之問題研究-以不可歸責於承攬人為中心」,國立台灣大學法律學院碩士論文,2008年7月。
[62]、王元甫,「由 FIDIC 契約範本論工程契約爭議問題」,台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文,2008年。

延伸閱讀