透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.189.170.17
  • 學位論文

董事會結構與總經理離職關係之研究-以台灣上市櫃銀行業為例

A Study on the Relationship between Board Structure and Top Executive Turnover- An Empirical Evidence of Listed and OTC Banks in Taiwan

指導教授 : 丁碧慧
共同指導教授 : 陳寧馨

摘要


本研究以高階管理者的離職為構面,探討台灣上市、櫃銀行業控制股東股權結構與董事會結構對高階管理者職機率之影響,並進一步驗證外部治理效力對控制股東超額控制權與高階管理者離職率間負向關係之抑制效果。實證結果發現,在我國銀行業裡,公司績效和高階管理者的離職機率間呈不顯著負相關。若進一步區分總經理與控制股東關係則發現,當高階管理者為控制股東法人代表時,績效的好壞並不影響到高階管理者的地位;反之,高階管理者若非控制股東法人代表,則公司績效的好壞會顯著的影響到總經理的去留。我們並發現董事會結構與控制股東股權結構對淘汰不適任高階管理者之內部治理效力的影響,僅在高階管理者非以控制股東法人代表身分擔任董事時,方見顯著效果。當高階管理者非控制股東代表法人時,控制股東所有權愈高,愈容易汰換績效不佳之高階管理者,而超額控制權與內部董事比愈高,亦確實對公司治理之監督機制有不利影響,即愈不會撤換不適任管理者,至於外部治理機制無論高階管理者與控制股東關係為何,對高階管理者之監督效果均不佳。 關鍵字:高階管理者離職、公司治理、董事會組成

並列摘要


This study discusses whether the composition of the board and the ownership structure affect top executive turnover: an empirical evidence of listed and OTC banks in Taiwan is used to test the impact of the interaction of external corporate governance and control on top executive turnover. The evidence indicates that firm performance has weaken negative impact on the probability of turnover in financial industry. Hence, the study distinguishes the types of top executives into insider and outsider aspects. When the top executives are insiders, poor firm performance doesn’t affect the top executive turnover. In other words, if the top executives are outsiders, firm performance has significantly negative impact over the top executive turnover. The paper also discovers that internal corporate governance has significantly impact on the top executive who is an outsider. The higher rank of top executives who are not controlling stockholders but with power over stockholders, the more chance to maneuver their firms effectively. Furthermore, the more inside board directors with exceeding power obtain adverse effect to eliminate unfit top executives, which implies that the poor corporate governance occurs. As to the external corporate governance, the top executive efficiency over their firms has nothing to do with their relationship with controlling stockholders. Key:Top Executives Turnover, Corporate Governance, Board Structure

參考文獻


15. 遲銘俊(民93)。董事會組成與股權結構對高階主管更迭、公司價值與績效之關聯性-以台灣上市(櫃)金融業及電子業為例。國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
1. 李佳玲、葉穎蓉、何進滄(民94)。績效、公司治理與高階管理者離職關係之實證研究。中山管理評論。第十三卷第一期,頁75-106。
25. Gilson, S. C. (1990). Bankruptcy, boards, bank and blockholders: evidence on Changes in Corporate Ownership and Control When Firm Default. Journal of Financial Economics, pp.355-387.
10. 廖秀梅(民93)。董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-探討台灣家族控制企業因素的影響。國立台北大學會計研究所博士論文,未出版,北市。
1. Abe, Yukiko. (1997). Chief executive turnover and firm performance in Japan. Journal of Japanese and International Economies, 11, pp.2-26.

被引用紀錄


莊雅涵(2016)。公司治理與功能性委員會對臺灣壽險業經營績效的影響〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2016.00451
潘湘琪(2013)。台新金與彰化銀行合併案評估之研究〔碩士論文,國立交通大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6842/NCTU.2013.00726
楊雅姝(2008)。財務會計準則第三十四號公報價值攸關性之研究-以台灣金融業為例〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2008.00064
曾益信(2011)。公司治理機制、多角化策略與高階管理者離職關聯之實證研究〔碩士論文,崑山科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0025-0807201113191300

延伸閱讀