良好圖面做為溝通工具能有效解決工程問題並減少施工錯誤,因此,設計師的圖學能力將實質影響工作完成的品質。為了解各校圖學課程的差異及室內設計師養成教育過程,圖學能力如何培養。研究方法採文獻分析法,就室內設計、圖學、課程設計、室內圖學定義、與其他專業領域圖學的差異先予釐清。再彙整國內高校室內設計系圖學課程資訊進行比較分析,並透過專家訪談,針對12所院校圖學教師分就課程規劃、圖學觀點、教學經驗等三部分,瞭解有關:傳統圖學與室內圖學內涵之差異、室內圖學課程教學目標、空間概念建構、識圖能力與製圖能力內涵、教學評量項目及標準等。訪談結果發現:1.各校授課內容偏重製圖能力的訓練,於識圖能力單元安排較少;2.空間能力建構的不足使天花板圖的課程單元較不易理解。就此發現做為課程設計之參考,從建構空間能力概念、圖學知識原理、製圖技能與規範三部分規劃36週之授課單元,特別針對天花板圖單元,完成教學內容設計。
An excellent drawing as a communication means will effectively correct engineering issues and reduce errors. Hence designer’s drawing ability will substantially affect the quality of completed work. In order to gain an understanding of differences in graphics courses between schools and also the process of the interior designer training as well as how designers learn their graphics ability, in this research, the interior design, graphics, course design and schematic design will be defined by studying other similar literatures and then differentiated from the graphics of other professional fields. Subsequently, the results are compared and analyzed against graphics courses offered in Interior Design Departments of various Taiwan high schools. Finally, the experts from 12 schools, mainly the interior graphics teachers, were interviewed about their views on course design, interior graphics, and teaching experience in order to understand differences between drawing and interior graphics, interior design courses and course objectives, space construction, schematic reading and drawing, course evaluation criteria and standards and etc. From the interviews, it was found that 1. courses offered in most schools focus on schematic drawing ability and less on schematic reading, and 2.inadequate ability in space construction leads to misunderstanding of courses related to ceiling schematic. The findings will be used as references for course design from space construction, schematic concept and theory to interior graphics skills and rules. The course duration will be 36 weeks, focusing mainly on ceiling schematic drawing.