透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.67.251
  • 學位論文

揭穿公司面紗原則於我國之適用

Application of Piercing the Corporate Veil in Taiwan

指導教授 : 楊竹生

摘要


我國公司法起初無揭穿公司面紗原則(Piercing the Corporate Veil)之立法,故對於濫用法人格之股東,債權人通常求償無門。民國102年1月30日我國增訂公司法第154條第2項,將揭穿公司面紗原則明文化,而如何適用該條文即成為重要的關鍵。首先,本文期望觀察法院如何適用與解釋公司法第154條第2項。另一方面,參酌修法前我國法院對於揭穿公司面紗之見解,比較修法前後我國法院見解之差異。再者,藉由法院見解整理我國目前適用公司法第154條第2項之困難。最後,參酌英國及美國揭穿公司面紗原則發展之情形,以期補足我國於公司法第154條第2項適用上之缺失。

並列摘要


Doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil had not been established in Taiwan before 2013. It was a common reason why creditors of the corporations were having difficulties in requiring stockholders who abused the corporate legal personality to compensate. The Legislature in Taiwan amended Section 2 of Article 154 of the Company Act and adopted the doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil in January 30, 2013. However, the key is to figure out the application of this amendment. Firstly, I need to observe how courts in Taiwan apply and interpret Section 2 of Article 154 of the Company Act. Secondly, I will look into the opinions of the courts regarding the doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil before the amendment in 2013, and compare them to the court opinions afterwards. Further, by summarizing the court opinions before and after the amendment, I will explore the difficulties of applying Section 2 of Article 154 of the Company Act nowadays. Lastly, I expect to point out the deficiencies of application of this amendment and propose some ways to help correct the deficiencies by referring to some cases and academic research papers regarding the doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil in the U.S. and UK.

參考文獻


李潔,論「揭穿公司面紗原則」功能之擴張及其於國際投資仲裁之適用,台灣大學碩士論文,邵慶平&林彩瑜博士共同指導(2015)
曾世雄,企業設計法,新學林出版(2002) 。
洪秀芬&朱德芳,關係企業債權人保護之發展趨勢:以揭穿公司面紗為核心,臺大法學論叢,第43卷第3期,頁641-718(2014)。
賴英照,中國公司立法之回顧與前瞻,臺大法學論叢,第13卷,第2期,頁193-230(1984)。
賴英照,公司法論文集,財團法人中華民國證券市場發展基金會(1994)。

延伸閱讀