透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.218.254.122
  • 學位論文

青少年正向思考、正向情緒與學習動機之相關研究

A Correlation Study of Adolescent’s Positive Thinking, Positive Emotion and Learning Motivation

指導教授 : 盧雪梅
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在探討青少年正向思考、正向情緒與學習動機之關係,採調查研究法,研究樣本為台灣本島地區公立國中的1459名學生,研究工具為「青少年正向思考量表」、「青少年之正向情緒量表」與「青少年學習動機量表」。「青少年正向思考量表」包括「認為正向事件是永久的」、「認為負向事件是短暫的」、「認為正向事件是普遍的」、「認為負向事件是特殊的」、「認為正向事件是內在的」、「認為負向事件是外在的」六個分量表;「青少年之正向情緒量表」包括「愉悅」、「心流」兩個分量表;「青少年學習動機量表」包括「工作價值」、「期望」、「免於測試焦慮的認知干擾」、「免於測試焦慮的情緒化」四個分量表。本研究運用的分析方法包括描述統計、單因子多變量變異數分析、典型相關、多元迴歸分析,主要研究發現羅列如下: 一、男生在動機之「期望」、「免於測試焦慮的認知干擾」、「免於測試焦慮的情緒化」顯著高於女生,在其餘的變項上則無顯著的性別差異。 二、整體來說,主觀家庭氣氛愈和諧者,其在正向思考、正向情緒和學習動機的得分有越高的傾向,惟正向思考之「認為負向事件是外在的」和動機之「免 於測試焦慮的認知干擾」與「免於測試焦慮的情緒化」例外。 三、整體來說,人際關係愈好者,其在正向思考、正向情緒和學習動機的得分有越高的傾向,惟正向思考之「認為負向事件是外在的」和動機之「免於測試 焦慮的認知干擾」與「免於測試焦慮的情緒化」例外。 四、有信仰宗教者在動機之「工作價值」與「期望」得分顯著高於無宗教信仰者,不過在「免於測試焦慮的認知干擾」與「免於測試焦慮的情緒化」卻顯著較低。在其餘的變項上,兩者則無顯著的組間差異。 五、有嗜好者在正向情緒之「心流」與動機之「期望」得分顯著高於無嗜好者。在其餘的變項上,兩者則無顯著的組間差異。 六、一週進行嗜好活動的時間愈長者,其在正向思考之「認為負向事件是外在的」、正向情緒之「心流」得分顯著高於一週進行嗜好活動的時間愈短者。在其餘的變項上,從事嗜好活動時間大致無顯著差異。 七、正向思考和正向情緒有顯著的典型相關,愈「認為正向事件是永久的」、「認為負向事件是短暫的」、「認為負向事件是特殊的」、「認為正向事件是內在的」,其愈感快樂,也愈能體驗個人能力與任務挑戰相符的專注忘我感。而愈「認為負向事件是短暫的」、「認為負向事件是特殊的」,其愈能體驗個人能力與任務挑戰相符的專注忘我感。 八、「心流」對「工作價值」、「期望」最具預測力;「認為負向事件是短暫的」對「免於測試焦慮的認知干擾」、「免於測試焦慮的情緒化」最具預測力。

並列摘要


This study aims to investigate the relationships between the positive thinking, positive emotion and learning motivation of Taiwan adolescents. The participants of this study are 1459 public junior high school students. The instruments for this study include Background Questionnaire, Positive Thinking Scale, Positive Emotion Scale and Learning Motivation Scale. Positive Thinking Scale consists of six subscales: Permanent Good, Temporariness Bad, Pervasiveness Good, Specificity Bad, Internality Good, and Externality Bad. Positive Emotion Scale consists of two subscales: Pleasures and Flow. Learning Motivation Scale consists of four subscales: Task value, Expectancy, Free of Cognitive Interference of Test Anxiety and Free of Emotional Stress of Test Anxiety. The statistical methods used in this study include descriptive statistics, one-way MANOVA, canonical correlation, and multiple-regression. Major findings are as follows: 1. The boys get significantly higher scores than girls on the subscales of Expectancy, Free of Cognitive Interference of Test Anxiety and Free of Emotional Stress of Test Anxiety; however, there are no significant gender differences on the other subscales. 2. Subjects with more harmonious family atmosphere generally get significantly higher scores on the subscales of Positive Thinking, Positive Emotion and Learning Motivation Scales with a few exceptions. The exceptions are Externality Bad, Free of Cognitive Interference of Test Anxiety, and Free of Emotional Stress of Test Anxiety. 3. Subjects with better interpersonal relationship generally get significantly higher scores on the subscales of Positive Thinking, Positive Emotion and Learning Motivation Scales with a few exceptions. The exceptions are Externality Bad, Free of Cognitive Interference of Test Anxiety and Free of Emotional Stress of Test Anxiety. 4. Subjects with religion get significantly higher scores on Task Value and Expectancy, but subjects without religion get significantly higher scores Free of Cognitive Interference of Test Anxiety and Free of Emotional Stress of Test Anxiety. There are no significant differences between groups on the other subscales. 5. Subjects who have hobbies get significantly higher scores on Flow and Expectancy; however, there are no significant differences between groups on the other subscales. 6. Subjects who spend more time on hobbies a week get significantly higher scores on Externality Bad and Flow; however, there are no significant differences among groups on the other subscales. 7. There are significant canonical correlations between Positive Thinking and Positive Emotion. 8. The regression analyses indicate the Flow is the most salient predicator to Task Value and Expectancy, and the Temporariness Bad is the most salient predicator to Free of Cognitive Interference of Test Anxiety, and Free of Emotional Stress of Test Anxiety.

參考文獻


pessimist? Exploring the role of hope as a moderator. The Journal of Positive
陳宏昌(2005)。教學省思-從學習動機談起。台灣教育,634,55-57。
劉福鎔(2005)。學習動機目標導向分析在課業學習諮商的應用。諮商與輔導,237,12-18。
劉素倫、林清文(2007)。國中教師班級經營與學生學習動機之研究。輔導與諮商學報,29 (1),1-24。
曾文志(2005)。人生的動力系統—如何和孩子談樂觀。師友月刊,452,77-84。

被引用紀錄


陳智偉(2011)。資訊融入情境式教學對於國中生 數學學習成效之影響〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2011.01330
李宸鎰(2018)。國中學生知覺教師資訊科技融入教學、教師正向態度與學生學習適應關係之研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201800381
林亞仕(2015)。高級中學學生英語學習動機、學習策略與學習滿意度關係之研究-以桃園市為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2015.00193
徐毓芸(2011)。正向心理學教學活動對提升國小學童壓力因應能力之成效評估〔碩士論文,中山醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6834/CSMU.2011.00119
洪若瑄(2017)。準備公職考試對大學生在校學習成效之影響:以學習策略為中介變項〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201700666

延伸閱讀