國民中小學教師對普通海洋教育政策評估研究-以四縣市為例

Elementary School and Junior High School Teachers’ Viewpoint toward General Marine Education Policy – A Case Study of Four Counties

高維敏(Wei-Min Kao)

指導教授 ： 王麗雲

國立臺灣師範大學/教育學院/教育政策與行政研究所/碩士(2011年)

摘要

本研究旨在探討我國國民中小學教師對於普通海洋教育政策的認知及評價程度，以及實際執行情況及所遭遇之困難，並以此提供相關單位做為推動海洋教育政策的參考。本研究以問卷調查方式進行研究，採分層抽樣調查抽取服務於台北市、高雄市、基隆市及南投縣學校共計610位教師。所得的資料以描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析等統計方式分析處理後，所得結論如下：一、教師雖認同海洋教育政策之重要性，但卻認為執行有困難；二、國民中小學執行海洋教育政策情況在四個縣市中以基隆市最高、台北市最低；三、教師認為欠缺相關資源是執行海洋教育的最大困難；四、教師對於教育部規劃的海洋教育政策瞭解不足；五、擔任職務、參與研習時數及個人從事水上休閒活動興趣為影響海洋教育政策評估的主要個人因素；六、學校附近是否具備相關教學資源是影響政策執行的重要因素；七、不同縣市教師對於海洋教育政策的評價、執行及認知有顯著差異。根據以上研究結果，研究者建議中央單位仍應永續推動海洋教育，且須提供實施海洋教育相關資源，並加強教師海洋知能的提升，配合定期檢核執行成效；縣市單位則建立推廣海洋教育互助機制，並建置符合需求的教學網站；學校則需確立校內推行海洋教育政策組織，及培育校內海洋教育種子教師，透過全體人員的努力，將可使海洋教育政策推行更為順利。

關鍵字

海洋教育 ； 海洋教育政策

並列摘要

The study aims to understand elementary school and junior high school teachers’ understanding and viewpoint toward general marine education policy. It also focus on the practice of the policy and the difficulty it meets during implementation, hoping to provide relative parties with the reference for promoting the marine education policy. The study adopted method of questionnaire survey. Stratified cluster sampling was used, for a total of 610 subjects who serve for schools in Taipei City, Kaohsiung City, Keelung City and Nantou County. The statistical techniques applied are descriptive statistics, t-test and one-way ANOVA. The major findings were follows: 1. Most teachers acknowledge the importance of marine education policy, but consider it too difficult to carry out. 2. The elementary schools and junior high schools in Keelung City stand out on top among the four cities in practicing the marine education policy, while schools in Taipei City have the least performance. 3. Teachers thought the difficulty of implementing the policy is the short of resources. 4. Teachers’ understanding toward marine education policy is insufficient. 5. Teachers’ viewpoint toward marine education policy is correlated with their position at school, participation in study related to marine education, and interest in water activities. 6. The more resource teachers can get from nearby schools, the more they carry out the policy. 7.The difference in teachers’ understanding and viewpoint toward marine education between cities is significant. Based on the results of study, it is suggested that the government should continually promote marine education and the application of marine education policy. Also, more related resources should be provided to enhance teachers’ marine knowledge, and regular evaluation of the implementation of marine education is needed. Local governments should establish cooperation mechanism and websites that meet teaching demands. Schools should form special groups for applying the marine education policy, and foster seed teachers to promote marine education.

並列關鍵字

Marine education ； Marine education policy

參考文獻

林水波(1999)。公共政策新論。台北市：智勝。

胡興華(2002)。海洋台灣。行政院農業委員會漁業署，台北市。

丘昌泰(2000)。公共政策基礎篇。台北市：巨流。

張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。台北市：東華。

何柔慧(2003)。台北縣國民小學教師教育改革壓力知覺與專業承諾之相關研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。