台北市國小運動代表隊現況與組訓考量因素研究

A Study of the Consideration Factors in Operation of Elementary Athletic teams in Taipei City

彭俊鵬(Chun-Peng Peng)

指導教授 ： 王宗吉

國立臺灣師範大學/運動與休閒學院/運動與休閒管理研究所在職碩士班/碩士(2004年)

摘要

台北市國小運動代表隊現況與組訓考量因素研究

2005.06 研究生：彭俊鵬
指導教授：王宗吉

摘 要

本研究之目的為了解台北市國民小學運動代表隊之現況及體育主管組訓運動代表隊考量之因素。運用自編之研究工具「台北市國小運動代表隊現況與組訓考量因素研究問卷」，以寄送方式進行調查。研究對象為台北市國小體育主管，實際發出111份問卷，回收75份問卷，剔除填答不完整的無效問卷後，有效問卷共74份，問卷回收率為66.7%。利用描述統計、F檢定、單因子變異數分析等統計方法分析後，主要研究結果如下：

一、台北市國小運動代表隊之現況：台北市81.9%的國小有傳統的運動代表隊；55.2%的國小，其運動代表隊都有擬訂訓練計劃，80%的國小在過去一年中，曾獲得比賽獎勵；81.9%的國小能充分支援代表隊組訓所需場地。
二、體育主管組訓運動代表隊考量之因素：
1. 體育主管認為組訓運動代表隊考量因素各層面之重要性依序為「選手條件」、「組訓資源」、「運動推廣」、「團隊認同」和「人才培育」。
2. 不同背景體育主管對組訓運動代表隊考量因素各層面重要性之認同程度如下：
（1）女性體育主管對各層面重要性之認同程度均高於男性體育主管。
（2）個人年齡、服務年資、現職年資不影響體育主管對考量因素各層面重要性之認同程度。
（3）沒有兼任教練職務的體育主管，在「組訓資源」因素重要程度的認知上，顯著高於兼任教練職務的體育主管，而在其他因素層面重要程度的認知上，則無顯著差異。
（4）體育主管對考量因素各層面重要性之認同程度，不因學校規模、體育主管是否具體育相關學歷、上級教育機關有無派任專任教練給學校而有所不同。

本研究之建議如下：

一、學校應選擇適合自身發展之運動代表隊，並發展成具代表學校特色之傳統團隊。
二、男女性的特質與觀點確實有所不同，未來可針對性別差異這部分進行更深入的研究。

關 鍵 字：運動代表隊、組訓

關鍵字

運動代表隊 ； 組訓

並列摘要

A Study of the Consideration Factors in Operation
of Elementary Athletic teams in Taipei City
Graduate Student: Peng, Chun-Peng Adviser: Wang, Zong-Ji
2005.06 Abstract
The aim of the study was to know the current situation of elementary athletic teams and the consideration factors in operation for athletic directors. A researcher self-designed questionnaire titled “The Current Situation of Elementary Athletic Teams and the Consideration Factors in Operation” was used to collect data, and to investigate by mailing. The subjects of this study were chiefs of physical education in Taipei City. Distributing 111 questionnaires, 75 questionnaires were returned and 74 questionnaires were valid. The valid rate was 66.7%. The important conclusions of this study were as follows:
1. The Current Situation of Elementary Athletic Teams in Taipei
Elementary athletic teams in Taipei were set up mainly by traditional teams of a school. 55.2% teams planned the training schedules, 80% teams had ever got reward in contests in last year. Besides, 81.9% teams could provide the funding supports of needed resources for athletic teams.
2. The Consideration Factors in Operation for Athletic Directors:
（1）For athletic directors, consideration factors in operating athletic teams were, in a descending importance order, athletes’ conditions, resources for operation, effectiveness in sport promotion, group identification, and athlete cultivation.
（2）The recognition level for different background of athletic directors on consideration factors in operation was as follows:
a. all the recognition levels for the female were significantly higher than those for the male.
b. Among three consideration factors that were age, seniority of service, and seniority on current position of athletic directors, there was no significant difference in athletic directors’ recognition level on every consideration factor in operation of athletic teams.
c. The recognition level on “resources for operation” for athletic directors without coaching positions was significantly higher than athletic directors with coaching positions. However, there was no significant difference for chiefs’ recognition level on every consideration factor in operation of athletic teams.
d. In athletic directors’ recognition level of consideration factors in operation of athletic teams, there was no difference among different scale of schools, athletic directors that had and did not have a sport/physical education relevant department, and athletic directors at schools that with or without full-time coaches assigned by the government.
The suggestions of the study were following:
1. Schools should choose the athletic teams that were suitable for self-development, and develop the teams to become traditional teams with schools of characteristics.
2. There were differences on characteristics and opinions between the males and the females. In the future, studies could be deeply searched on gender differences.

Key words: Athletic teams, Operation.

並列關鍵字

Athletic teams ； Operation

參考文獻

簡曜輝（1999）。我國學校體育發展策略。行政院體育委員會。

行政院體委會（1999）。中華民國體育白皮書。台北市：作者。

教育部體育司（1998）。學校體育中程計畫。台北市：作者。

林錦明（2001）。談國民小學運動代表隊組訓。國教新知，48（1）， 66-71。

張思敏（2003）。學校運動代表隊的經營與管理。學校體育，13（5），23-29。