透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.228.35
  • 學位論文

台灣北區汽車保修廠管理者管理行為之研究

A Study of the Managerial Behavior of Automotive Service Center Managers in Northern Taiwan

指導教授 : 李景峰
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


無資料

並列摘要


The organizational culture of automotive service centers began with and stems from basic factory safety and sanitation. Improving the use of information about car owners and the offering of integrated services is an area that is changing quickly as competition in the automotive service market increases (YULON Motors, 1988). Higher levels of service quality and a greater variety of services like after-hours maintenance, maintenance booked in advance, acting as insurance agents and inspection stations. Today, the knowledge and technical ability of technical staff is gradually being simplified by improvements in material science lowering the difference in service quality offered by different service centers. Hence, the only way for the service centers to produce real variety of service and service quality is for shop supervisors, leaders, managers and technical staff to receive constant cultivation and training. Leaders behavior descriptions were obtained from the leaders and their subordinates (Yukl, 1995). The same logic can be applied to the relationship between managers and technical staff and its effect on the work performance, morale and even the work attitude of the technical staff. The purpose of this study is to understand the current situation in regards to the behavior of managers in automotive service centers in northern Taiwan. The nature of the differences between managers’ self-reporting and the evaluation of them by others, in addition to the factors that influence managers and their behavior. This study was conducted using a modified version of a Managerial Practices Survey (MPS) created by the foreign scholar, Yukl (1995). After the survey results were returned they were put through SPSS software for analysis. The results were divided into percentages, means, standard deviations, and so on, which were drawn from independent sample T-test, one-way ANOVA and Scheffé method statistical testing and calculation. The following conclusions can be drawn from the results of the study. 1.In looking at the relationship between managers and technical staff there is an obvious difference that exists between managerial behavior and the recognition it is given. This includes “recognition” and “support” where the difference was at its largest. 2.The managerial behaviors of “networking”, “delegating”, “developing” and “rewarding”, both in the eyes of the managers and the recognition given by technical staff, were seen to be of low importance. This shows that managers’ attitude to the handling of daily work or the setting up of work systems still has some facets that need thought or adjustment. 3.There is no significant difference between results from the whole range of managerial behavior and the individual factors related to the managers. However, there are some significant differences within individual managerial behavior items and factors relating to the managers. The 5 influencing factors are “age – informing”, “seniority – recognizing”, “the number of service centers at which he/she has already been manager – networking”, “is or is not a member of professional car clubs or associations – delegating” and “the number of technical staff members – rewarding”. Of which, manager’s age and seniority cannot be improved or changed from its current situation but the other categories weak points can be strengthened. In regards to the number of service centers at which he/she has already been manager and is or is not a member of a professional car clubs or associations, these two items depend on his/her work experience and help them in their management work. As for the number of technical staff members it can be seen as a reference point for management evaluation to be used to compare when evaluating the management of other service centers, in the way changes in the number of technical staff affects the manager’s management attitudes.

被引用紀錄


詹勳林(2004)。台灣省高職專業類科教師評鑑內涵之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2004200710435906
張俊興(2009)。汽車服務廠廠長領導能力之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315173411
倪貞貞(2012)。競爭優勢與顧客滿意度分析以中華汽車為例〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-1903201314441486
鄭源森(2012)。汽車保養維修業加盟連鎖經營模式之探討〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0006-1107201216591800

延伸閱讀